“…Accuracy (Souly and Shah, 2016) [21] 85.10% (Wang et al, 2009) [16] 85.60% (Le et al, 2011) [1] 86.50% (Kovashka and Grauman, 2010) [17] 87.20% (Wang et al, 2011) [18] 89.10% (Weinzaepfel et al, 2015) [22] 90.50% (Abdulmunem et al, 2016) [20] 90.90% (Ravanbakhsh et al, 2015) [37] 88.10% (Wang et al, 2018) [39] 91.89% (Zhou et al, 2017) [28] 90.00% Basic method 85.30% Proposed method 92.00% UCF-11 Methods Accuracy (Hasan et al, 2014) [2] 54.50% (Liu et al, 2009) [43] 71.20% (Ikizler-Cinbis et al, 2010) [36] 75.20% (Wang et al, 2011) [18] 84.20% (Sharma et al, 2015) [27] 84.90% (Cho et al, 2014) [19] 88.00% (Ravanbakhsh et al, 2015) [37] 77.10% (Wang et al, 2018) [39] 98.76% (Gammulle et al, 2017) [38] 89.20% (Gilbert et al, 2017) [3] 86.70% Basic method 82.40% Proposed method 92.40%…”