2022
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.7250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human action recognition using fusion‐based discriminative features and long short term memory classification

Abstract: Summary Proposed is a discriminative feature modeling technique in three orthogonal planes (TOP) for human action recognition (HAR). Pyramidal histogram of orientation gradient‐TOP (PHOG‐TOP) and dense optical flow‐TOP (DOF‐TOP) techniques are utilized for salient motion estimation and description to represent the human action in a compact but distinct manner. The contribution of the work is to explicitly learn the gradual change of visual patterns using fusion of PHOG‐TOP and DOF‐TOP technique to discover the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 showcases the results that indicate that our proposed DA-R3DCNN achieved the highest accuracy of 98.6%, surpassing all other methods. The Fusion-based discriminative features method [31]came in second place, with an accuracy of 97.8%. Among the comparative methods, the lowest accuracy on the UCF11 dataset was obtained by the Local-global features + QSVM method [32], which achieved an accuracy of 82.6%.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 showcases the results that indicate that our proposed DA-R3DCNN achieved the highest accuracy of 98.6%, surpassing all other methods. The Fusion-based discriminative features method [31]came in second place, with an accuracy of 97.8%. Among the comparative methods, the lowest accuracy on the UCF11 dataset was obtained by the Local-global features + QSVM method [32], which achieved an accuracy of 82.6%.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-task hierarchical clustering [33] 2017 89.7 BT-LSTM [34] 2018 85.3 Deep autoencoder [35] 2019 96.2 Two-stream attention LSTM [36] 2020 96.9 Weighted entropy-variances based feature selection [37] 2021 94.5 Dilated CNN+BiLSTM+RB [38] 2021 89.0 DS-GRU [39] 2021 97.1 Local-global features + QSVM [32] 2021 82.6 Squeezed CNN [40] 2022 87.4 Fusion-based discriminative features [31] 2022 97.8 BS-2SCN [41] 2022 90.1 3DCNN [42] 2022 85.1 DA-R3DCNN (Proposed) 2023 98.6…”
Section: Methods Year Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%