2022 11th International Symposium on Signal, Image, Video and Communications (ISIVC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/isivc54825.2022.9800210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Action Recognition Using Squeezed Convolutional Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the comparative methods, the lowest accuracy on the UCF11 dataset was obtained by the Local-global features + QSVM method [32], which achieved an accuracy of 82.6%. The rest of the comparative methods included Multi-task hierarchical clustering [33], BT-LSTM [34], Deep autoencoder [35], Two-stream attention LSTM [36], Weighted entropy-variances-based feature selection [37], Dilated CNN + BiLSTM + RB [38], DS-GRU [39], Squeezed CNN [40], BS-2SCN [41], and 3DCNN [42]. These methods achieved accuracies of 89.7%, 85.3%, 96.2%, 96.9%, 94.5%, 89.0%, 97.1%, 87.4%, 90.1%, and 85.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the comparative methods, the lowest accuracy on the UCF11 dataset was obtained by the Local-global features + QSVM method [32], which achieved an accuracy of 82.6%. The rest of the comparative methods included Multi-task hierarchical clustering [33], BT-LSTM [34], Deep autoencoder [35], Two-stream attention LSTM [36], Weighted entropy-variances-based feature selection [37], Dilated CNN + BiLSTM + RB [38], DS-GRU [39], Squeezed CNN [40], BS-2SCN [41], and 3DCNN [42]. These methods achieved accuracies of 89.7%, 85.3%, 96.2%, 96.9%, 94.5%, 89.0%, 97.1%, 87.4%, 90.1%, and 85.1%, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-task hierarchical clustering [33] 2017 89.7 BT-LSTM [34] 2018 85.3 Deep autoencoder [35] 2019 96.2 Two-stream attention LSTM [36] 2020 96.9 Weighted entropy-variances based feature selection [37] 2021 94.5 Dilated CNN+BiLSTM+RB [38] 2021 89.0 DS-GRU [39] 2021 97.1 Local-global features + QSVM [32] 2021 82.6 Squeezed CNN [40] 2022 87.4 Fusion-based discriminative features [31] 2022 97.8 BS-2SCN [41] 2022 90.1 3DCNN [42] 2022 85.1 DA-R3DCNN (Proposed) 2023 98.6…”
Section: Methods Year Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%