“…Among the comparative methods, the lowest accuracy on the UCF11 dataset was obtained by the Local-global features + QSVM method [32], which achieved an accuracy of 82.6%. The rest of the comparative methods included Multi-task hierarchical clustering [33], BT-LSTM [34], Deep autoencoder [35], Two-stream attention LSTM [36], Weighted entropy-variances-based feature selection [37], Dilated CNN + BiLSTM + RB [38], DS-GRU [39], Squeezed CNN [40], BS-2SCN [41], and 3DCNN [42]. These methods achieved accuracies of 89.7%, 85.3%, 96.2%, 96.9%, 94.5%, 89.0%, 97.1%, 87.4%, 90.1%, and 85.1%, respectively.…”