2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7139613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human activity recognition using LZW-Coded Probabilistic Finite State Automata

Abstract: Human activity recognition has become an increasingly important field of research with many practical applications related to health care and leisure activities. The accessibility of inexpensive portable sensors, such as accelerometers, allows for a widespread use of this technology for both commercial and personal activity recognition. This paper develops a novel feature extraction approach to human activity recognition through the development of the Lempel-Ziv-Welch Coded Probabilistic Finite State Automata … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will use data where the activity is known beforehand. This is reasonable because of high accuracies achieved for activity recognition in other work [24]. Based on our previous research in the field of activity recognition [18], our hypothesis is that we can obtain even higher accuracies for our use case and setting, because our solution does not rely on a fine-grained distinction between activities, as discussed in section 4.4.…”
Section: Misauthentication Resistance Under Different Motion Activitiessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will use data where the activity is known beforehand. This is reasonable because of high accuracies achieved for activity recognition in other work [24]. Based on our previous research in the field of activity recognition [18], our hypothesis is that we can obtain even higher accuracies for our use case and setting, because our solution does not rely on a fine-grained distinction between activities, as discussed in section 4.4.…”
Section: Misauthentication Resistance Under Different Motion Activitiessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…(2) explicitly exploit gait cycles to extract features: their first step is always to discover the gait cycle and extract it from the data sample. While the first assumption is reasonable for completely different activities (Wilson et al [24] achieved an activity classification accuracy of 95%), this is not valid for the latter. It is useless to extract gait cycles for sitting, and not straightforward to find patterns similar to gait cycles for activities like rowing, going to the gym or cycling.…”
Section: Misauthentication Resistance Under Different Motion Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, features can be represented by the transition probabilities between states using the probabilistic finite state automata (PFSA) [ 32 ]. However, the computational complexity of calculating the transition probabilities is high.…”
Section: Sensor-based Rehabilitation Exercise Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lempel–Ziv–Welch (LZW)-coded PFSA [ 32 ] uses the LZW coding to symbolize sensor data and the PFSA to compute the state transition probabilities between hidden states. It consists of three steps: quantization, LZW coding, and PFSA construction.…”
Section: Sensor-based Rehabilitation Exercise Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation