The use of membrane barriers and bone grafting materials in endodontic surgery promotes healing by regeneration rather than repair by scar tissue. Due to its valuable regenerative and therapeutic properties, the human amniotic membrane can support ideal periapical rehabilitation and promote better healing after surgery. The current trial aimed to evaluate the amniotic membrane's healing potential and compare it with platelet‐rich fibrin using color doppler sonography. The current study is a randomized, double‐blinded, parallel‐group, single‐center study. Thirty‐four systematically healthy individuals requiring endodontic surgery who fulfilled all inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected and randomly placed in two groups. Surgical curettage of the bony lesion was performed and filled with hydroxyapatite graft. Amniotic membrane (Group 1) and platelet‐rich fibrin (Group 2) were placed over the bony crypt, and the flap was sutured back. The lesion's surface area and vascularity were the parameters assessed with ultrasound and color doppler. and observations: The groups found a significant difference in mean vascularity at 1 month and mean vascularity change from baseline to 1 month (p < 0.05). Mean surface area had no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, in terms of the percentage change in surface area, a significant difference was found from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05). Amniotic membrane was a significantly better promoter of angiogenesis than platelet‐rich fibrin in the current trial. The osteogenic potential of both materials was similar. However, the clinical application, availability, and cost‐effectiveness of amniotic membrane support it as a promising therapeutic alternative in clinical translation. Further large‐scale trials and histologic studies are warranted.