“…Parallel evaluation of different encapsulation platforms in the same experimental setting, which could provide critical information to identify strengths and weaknesses to be addressed before clinical testing, has not been performed. Here, we aimed at examining in parallel selected microencapsulation platforms that were previously reported to permit long-term diabetes reversal in preclinical T1D models: single and double capsules (SCs, traditional microencapsulation method, and DCs, improved method for biocompatibility, respectively) made of alginate ( Safley et al, 2013 ; Safley et al, 2018 ; Safley et al, 2020 ) (medium viscosity high guluronic, MVG, or low viscosity high mannuronic acid, LVM) and conformally coated capsules (CCs, improved method for capsule size minimization) made of polyethylene glycol (PEG) ( Tomei et al, 2014 ; Manzoli et al, 2018 ). We determined how the different capsule characteristics affect the functionality of primary human islets (HIs) in vitro (i.e., glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, GSIS) and in vivo (blood glucose monitoring and glucose tolerance test, GTT) in their conventional transplant site (SCs, DCs: peritoneal cavity; CCs: fat pad) compared with non-coated (NC) HIs.…”