2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (≥10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was not significant difference in embryo development to blastocyst when day three embryos had 8-10 or more cells (Table 2), which reaffirms that fast cleaving embryos are as good as embryos with 8 cells to accomplish the blastocyst stage. This result is similar to that reported by Luna (Luna et al, 2008), and reaffirm that fast cleavage at day three is not a poor prognostic factor for the embryo. On the other hand, as was also suggested by Shapiro (Shapiro et al, 2000), the probability of reaching a good quality blastocyst from an embryo with reach day five being an expanded blastocyst.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there was not significant difference in embryo development to blastocyst when day three embryos had 8-10 or more cells (Table 2), which reaffirms that fast cleaving embryos are as good as embryos with 8 cells to accomplish the blastocyst stage. This result is similar to that reported by Luna (Luna et al, 2008), and reaffirm that fast cleavage at day three is not a poor prognostic factor for the embryo. On the other hand, as was also suggested by Shapiro (Shapiro et al, 2000), the probability of reaching a good quality blastocyst from an embryo with reach day five being an expanded blastocyst.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many parameters have been used to predict the outcome of cleaving embryos, such as the speed of cleavage (Luna et al, 2008), number of blastomeres (Shapiro et al, 2000;Langley et al, 2001;Luna et al, 2008) and embryo morphology at day 3 (Rijnders & Jansen 1998;Stone et al, 2005;nomura et al, 2007), all of which, provide relevant elements to evaluate the capacity of cleaving embryos to reach blastocyst. This study combines all parameters, allowing a comparison between them, and also provides novel information about the characteristics of developing embryos when blastocysts have 100% implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also found that there was no significant difference in the rates of formation of blastocysts and good-morphology blastocysts from high-quality embryos of 6-8 cells and !9 cells. These findings are consistent with an earlier study, comparing embryos of 6 cells, 7-9 cells, and !10 cells, which observed that the rates of formation of blastocysts and goodquality blastocysts were significantly higher in rapid-cleavage embryos than in slow-cleavage embryos [Luna et al 2008]. Those results suggested that the rate of blastocyst formation was closely related to day-3-embryo morphology and cell number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[29][30][31] Others reported that blastocysts with greater numbers of TE cells develop a more robust placenta in utero, improving sustenance of the fetus. 26,27 It is possible that the increased number of hatching/hatched blastocysts in the present study was a result of a significantly higher number of TE nuclei in the single medium, leading to a higher rate of blastocyst expansion. In contrast to single medium, the early stage medium of the sequential culture does not contain amino acids, glucose, and EDTA (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%