2018
DOI: 10.1177/2041669518766367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Body Odour Composites Are Not Perceived More Positively than the Individual Samples

Abstract: It is well established that composite facial images are perceived as more attractive compared with individual images, suggesting a preference for heterozygosity. Similarly, there is evidence that preferences for body odours might be linked to heterozygosity. Here, we tested whether blending individual body odours into composites would follow a similar pattern as observed in the perception of faces. We collected axillary odour samples from 38 individuals, which were subsequently assessed individually and as com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were rated using verbally anchored 7-point scales for their (i) pleasantness, (ii) attractiveness, (iii) masculinity and (iv) intensity. In the event that raters found any of the samples too weak to assess, they were asked to select "I cannot smell the sample" instead of using the rating scales (this occurred in 5.28% of cases, rate similar to previous studies, e.g., Fialová, Sorokowska, Roberts, Kubicová, & Havlíček, 2018); these ratings were not included in further analysis. Participants recorded their rating immediately after sniffing each stimulus, but the time spent sniffing was not restricted.…”
Section: Odour Rating Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were rated using verbally anchored 7-point scales for their (i) pleasantness, (ii) attractiveness, (iii) masculinity and (iv) intensity. In the event that raters found any of the samples too weak to assess, they were asked to select "I cannot smell the sample" instead of using the rating scales (this occurred in 5.28% of cases, rate similar to previous studies, e.g., Fialová, Sorokowska, Roberts, Kubicová, & Havlíček, 2018); these ratings were not included in further analysis. Participants recorded their rating immediately after sniffing each stimulus, but the time spent sniffing was not restricted.…”
Section: Odour Rating Sessionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually this involves two or more days of refraining from eating foods that influence odour (e.g. garlic, Fialová et al, 2016 ), from drinking alcohol or even coffee (Mutic et al, 2016 ), and from smoking (Fialová et al, 2018 ) or being around smokers. Donors may even be asked to avoid excessive exercise for several days (e.g.…”
Section: Reasons For Cautionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples from the 4 most pleasant scoring odours were pooled to create a "high quality" (HQ) male odour, while pooling of the 4 lowest scoring odours formed a "low quality" (LQ) male odour. Pooling of such samples to create a composite odour minimises effects of individual differences in odour quality and preference while maintaining the average quality of the constituent samples (Fialová et al, 2018). To create these composites, each cotton pad was shredded into small pieces and mixed in equal parts with the other odours in either the HQ or LQ category, before being frozen in sealable bags.…”
Section: Odour Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%