2009
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-139741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human C/EBP-ϵ activator and repressor isoforms differentially reprogram myeloid lineage commitment and differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bedi et al previously demonstrated that enforced expression of the transcriptional activator isoforms C/EBPe 32/30 in hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulated eosinophil differentiation at the expense of granulocyte/ macrophage differentiation, whereas overexpression of the C/EBPe 27 or C/EBPe 14 isoforms inhibited eosinophil differentiation. 20 In agreement with these data, we observed disturbed neutrophil maturation accompanied by an increase in eosinophil precursors in some, but not all, donors, suggesting this is dependent on C/EBPe 32/30 expression levels. Intriguingly, compared with the lysine dead mutant, enforced expression of C/EBPe R121/198K rescued neutrophil differentiation, yet induced no increase in eosinophil precursors or aberrant neutrophil maturation, suggesting these lysines are selectively important for terminal neutrophil differentiation (supplemental Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bedi et al previously demonstrated that enforced expression of the transcriptional activator isoforms C/EBPe 32/30 in hematopoietic progenitor cells stimulated eosinophil differentiation at the expense of granulocyte/ macrophage differentiation, whereas overexpression of the C/EBPe 27 or C/EBPe 14 isoforms inhibited eosinophil differentiation. 20 In agreement with these data, we observed disturbed neutrophil maturation accompanied by an increase in eosinophil precursors in some, but not all, donors, suggesting this is dependent on C/EBPe 32/30 expression levels. Intriguingly, compared with the lysine dead mutant, enforced expression of C/EBPe R121/198K rescued neutrophil differentiation, yet induced no increase in eosinophil precursors or aberrant neutrophil maturation, suggesting these lysines are selectively important for terminal neutrophil differentiation (supplemental Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These functional differences, transcriptional activation by C/EBPe 32/30 , transcriptional repression by C/EBPe 27 , and dominant negative regulation by C/EBPe 14 , can, at least partly, be explained by analysis of the functional domains of human-C/EBPe. [20][21][22][23] In addition to using activation and repression domains to regulate transcriptional activity, the expression and function of transcription factors is regulated by posttranslational modifications. Concerning C/EBP transcription factors, several posttranslational modification sites have been characterized, primarily on C/EBPa and C/EBPb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other examples are C/EBP«, whose different isoforms are endowed with the ability to specifically reprogram myeoid lineage commitment (Bedi et al, 2009;Halene et al, 2010) and Irf8, which extinguishes neutrophil production and promotes DC lineage commitment (Becker et al, 2012). These and other studies have clearly shown that hematopoietic cell fate is dependent on several key transcription factors, and .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[27][28][29] Interestingly, this type of regulation of various cellular processes was all dependent on proteinprotein interactions. Previous co-immunoprecipitation assays, 7 together with the co-localization of isoforms 1 and 2 proteins reflected by immunohistochemistry and subcellular immunofluorescence analyses, also support an inhibition by heteromeric interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%