1998
DOI: 10.1006/juec.1997.2048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Capital and Metropolitan Employment Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
173
1
12

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
173
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…34 However, the university before 1500 AD dummy becomes insignificant when added to the measure of current regional human capital. This suggests that universities lead to advantages among regions concerning their human capital that 33 This finding is for example in line with Simon (1998) and Gennaioli et al (2013) who highlight the importance of human capital for regional development and city growth. 34 In the specification with the distance to trade center variable and historical region characteristics (column (7)), the other historical region characteristics also seem to be significant (at least at the 10% level).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…34 However, the university before 1500 AD dummy becomes insignificant when added to the measure of current regional human capital. This suggests that universities lead to advantages among regions concerning their human capital that 33 This finding is for example in line with Simon (1998) and Gennaioli et al (2013) who highlight the importance of human capital for regional development and city growth. 34 In the specification with the distance to trade center variable and historical region characteristics (column (7)), the other historical region characteristics also seem to be significant (at least at the 10% level).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Lucas (1988) argues that cities are the preferred unit of analysis when human capital (and associated externalities) may be an important component of the growth process. For instance, Drennan (2005), Glaeser and Saiz (2004), Simon and Nardinelli (2002), Simon (1998), Glaeser, Scheinkman, and Shleifer (1995), Crihfield and Panggabean (1995) and Rauch (1993) examine determinants of growth for metropolitan areas (and cities) and find that human capital has a powerful impact on economic performance, as measured by population, employment, and income growth, as well as on productivity. These studies also examine a variety of influences on metropolitan growth, including industry mix, amenities, race, and geography, as well as manufacturing and public capital investment.…”
Section: Literature and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has used a wide variety of explanatory variables, including human capital, industry mix, amenities, race, and geography, as well as inputs into the production process, like manufacturing and public capital investment. Human capital investment, measured by education attainment, is often found to be highly correlated with strong metropolitan growth, for instance in Drennan (2005), Glaeser and Saiz (2004), Simon (1998), Glaeser, Scheinkman, and Shleifer (1995), and Crihfield and Panggabean (1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional economic studies have linked higher levels of human capital to increases in employment and population growth, wages, and housing prices (Moretti 2004;Simon 1998;Glaeser, Scheinkman and Shleifer 1995;Rauch 1993). In addition, larger stocks of human capital have been shown to lead to more rapid reinvention and increases in longrun economic vitality (Glaeser 2005;Glaeser and Saiz 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%