2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human capital Kuznets curve with subsistence consumption level

Abstract: We examine the human capital Kuznets curve in a simple model that does not assume increasing returns to scale in human capital formation. With a utility function that specifies a subsistence consumption level, consumption is a necessary good and education is a luxury good. As the children of poor households receive a low level of education, the gap in human capital endowments expands between poor and rich households. Eventually, economic development increases income and expenditure for education, and income in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stone-Geary utility function has been widely used in the economic literature including, of particular relevance in this context, to examine the relationship between poverty and economic growth. See, for example,Steger (2000);Ravn et al (2008);Ogaki and Zhang (2001);Kraay and Raddatz (2007) Matsuo and Tomoda (2012). use a Stone-Geary utility to examine investment in education, whileAchury et al (2012) examine the relationship between a subsistence constraint and savings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stone-Geary utility function has been widely used in the economic literature including, of particular relevance in this context, to examine the relationship between poverty and economic growth. See, for example,Steger (2000);Ravn et al (2008);Ogaki and Zhang (2001);Kraay and Raddatz (2007) Matsuo and Tomoda (2012). use a Stone-Geary utility to examine investment in education, whileAchury et al (2012) examine the relationship between a subsistence constraint and savings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, increases in human capital inequality in earlier phases are followed by subsequent reductions in human capital inequality in later phases of economic development. For empirical contributions, see e.g., De Gregorio and Lee (2002), Castello and Domenech (2002), Lim and Tang (2008) and Morrisson and Murtin (2013); for theoretical models see e.g., Galor and Tsiddon (1996), Glomm and Ravikamur (1998) and Matsuo and Tomoda (2012).…”
Section: Government Intervention In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, increases in human capital inequality in earlier phases are followed by subsequent reductions in human capital inequality in later phases of economic development. For empirical contributions, see e.g., De Gregorio and Lee (2002), Castello and Domenech (2002), Lim and Tang (2008) and Morrisson and Murtin (2013); for theoretical models see e.g., Galor and Tsiddon (1996), Glomm and Ravikamur (1998) and Matsuo and Tomoda (2012). investments in primary education have brought high private and social returns for at least the last 600 years.…”
Section: Government Intervention In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%