2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05199-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-centered design as a guide to intervention planning for non-communicable diseases: the BIGPIC study from Western Kenya

Abstract: Background: Non-communicable disease (NCD) care in Sub-Saharan Africa is challenging due to barriers including poverty and insufficient health system resources. Local culture and context can impact the success of interventions and should be integrated early in intervention design. Human-centered design (HCD) is a methodology that can be used to engage stakeholders in intervention design and evaluation to tailor-make interventions to meet their specific needs. Methods: We created a Design Team of health profess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our design team used a cocreation approach, in which participants represented end-users of the implementation strategy (not an external design thinking team). As has been described in prior studies in this setting, co-creation adds contextual insights not only to design products but also to implementation processes by building partnerships with local stakeholders (18,37).…”
Section: Advancing Human-centered Implementation Researchmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our design team used a cocreation approach, in which participants represented end-users of the implementation strategy (not an external design thinking team). As has been described in prior studies in this setting, co-creation adds contextual insights not only to design products but also to implementation processes by building partnerships with local stakeholders (18,37).…”
Section: Advancing Human-centered Implementation Researchmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The STRENGTHS project ultimately aims to improve referral networks and coordination of hypertension care using a combination of peer-based support and health information technology (HIT) (16). HCD is increasingly applied to implementation research, and we have successfully used this approach in previous studies (17,18). Here, we report on the process of developing and evaluating the STRENGTHS implementation strategy in western Kenya through an HCD approach prior to implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the anticipated social network benefit of GMV could synergistically interact with the economic benefit of MF to further enhance both health and financial outcomes, beyond what might be possible with each component individually. Given that this qualitative inquiry was the formative component of a larger implementation research trial [ 12 ], we have been vigilant to incorporate the findings from this inquiry into the design of the BIGPIC intervention using a stakeholder-based, human-centered design process [ 31 ]. At the same time, we recognize that our planned intervention will not be able to fully solve all of the potential issues, such as poverty and lack of health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in general felt that, despite the barriers presented by stigma, skepticism, and socio-economic fragility, the combination of GMV and MF could potentially address those barriers and be successful despite those factors. Given that this qualitative inquiry was the formative component of a larger implementation research trial (12), we have been vigilant to incorporate the ndings from this inquiry into the design of the BIGPIC intervention using a stakeholder-based, human-centered design process (32). At the same time, we recognize that our planned intervention will not be able to fully solve all of the potential issues, such as poverty and lack of health insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%