2017
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-16-0233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Dendritic Cells Mitigate NK-Cell Dysfunction Mediated by Nonselective JAK1/2 Blockade

Abstract: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have achieved positive responses in myeloproliferative neoplasms, but at the expense of decreased natural killer (NK) cell numbers and compromised function. Selective JAK2 inhibition may also have a role in preventing and treating graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although JAK inhibitors can impair monocyte-derived dendritic cell (moDC) activation and function and suppress effector T-cell responses, the effects on NK cells and the rele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, ruxolitinib inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 equally (4). Ruxolitinib is known to suppress STAT5 phosphorylation in human T cells and NK cells via JAK1 inhibition (15,17). Others and we show that ruxolitinib, as opposed to pacritinib, significantly impairs human CTL function (15), although this is not observed among murine T cells in vivo (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison, ruxolitinib inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 equally (4). Ruxolitinib is known to suppress STAT5 phosphorylation in human T cells and NK cells via JAK1 inhibition (15,17). Others and we show that ruxolitinib, as opposed to pacritinib, significantly impairs human CTL function (15), although this is not observed among murine T cells in vivo (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Ruxolitinib suppresses host-reactive T cells in mice (4,(12)(13)(14) and humans (4,11). Although not observed in murine transplant studies (4,(12)(13)(14), ruxolitinib reduces the quantity of human Tregs (15) and natural killer (NK) cells (16,17). Therefore, targeting JAK2 has the potential to prevent GVHD without conceding JAK1-mediated functions provided by donor lymphocytes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Ruxolitinib also reversibly improved the killing and degranulation of NK cells and ameliorated organ damage in HLH animal models. 16,[35][36] In 2016, Das et al used lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus to infect perforinde cient mice and construct a model of secondary HLH. A large dose of ruxolitinib (90 mg/kg) not only improved the disease symptoms and decreased cytokine levels in HLH model mice, but also increased the survival rates in mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruxolitinib inhibits JAK1 and JAK2 with similar potency, is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of intermediate to high-risk myelofibrosis [58], and has shown promising efficacy in treating steroid-refractory GVHD [36,37]. Myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib do exhibit significantly reduced numbers of circulating Th1, Th17, Tregs, and NK cells [46][47][48]. The loss of human Th1 and Th17 cells is likely driven primarily by JAK2 inhibition [38,46,59], whereas Tregs and NK cells are susceptible to JAK1 blockade and impaired STAT5 signal transduction [46][47][48].…”
Section: Jak1/2 Versus Jak2 Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib do exhibit significantly reduced numbers of circulating Th1, Th17, Tregs, and NK cells [46][47][48]. The loss of human Th1 and Th17 cells is likely driven primarily by JAK2 inhibition [38,46,59], whereas Tregs and NK cells are susceptible to JAK1 blockade and impaired STAT5 signal transduction [46][47][48]. The broad immune suppression by ruxolitinib may increase the risk of opportunistic infections, including reports of cytomegalovirus retinitis, mycobacterial infections, and Cryptococcus meningitis [49].…”
Section: Jak1/2 Versus Jak2 Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%