Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3323933.3324076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Detection in Thermal Imaging Using YOLO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the proposed model was compared to other related methods to measure the performance of human detection and recognition at night depending on the fusion of the face and gait method, as shown in Table 5 . The results of the YOLOv3-Human model based on the fusion of face and gait biometrics were outperformed by other related results obtained by the individual biometrics recognition models, e.g., TIRFaceNet model [ 66 ], YOLO model [ 69 ], and MMTOD model [ 28 ] on the same night databases. The YOLOv3-Human model achieved an accuracy rate of 99% for face and gender recognition, which exceeds the accuracy (89.7%) achieved by the TIRFaceNet model for individual facial recognition evaluated on the same DHU Night dataset, in addition to achieving an accuracy of 90% for gait recognition with large-size subjects.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, the proposed model was compared to other related methods to measure the performance of human detection and recognition at night depending on the fusion of the face and gait method, as shown in Table 5 . The results of the YOLOv3-Human model based on the fusion of face and gait biometrics were outperformed by other related results obtained by the individual biometrics recognition models, e.g., TIRFaceNet model [ 66 ], YOLO model [ 69 ], and MMTOD model [ 28 ] on the same night databases. The YOLOv3-Human model achieved an accuracy rate of 99% for face and gender recognition, which exceeds the accuracy (89.7%) achieved by the TIRFaceNet model for individual facial recognition evaluated on the same DHU Night dataset, in addition to achieving an accuracy of 90% for gait recognition with large-size subjects.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They integrate a hardwired adaptive Boolean-map-based saliency (ABMS) kernel with the YOLO detector, to generate a saliency feature map that boosts the pedestrian from the background based on the particular season. In [23,24] YOLO detector was trained on a thermal image dataset for person detection. This paper greatly extends the scope of that work by analyzing different weather conditions separately, by testing on other datasets and including possibly confusing objects such as animals in the test.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weather conditions are another major factor that affects the recording quality and thus the detection performance. With the deterioration of weather conditions, the distance at which it is possible to make a successful object or person detection is reduced [23]. For example, somebody parts that may be important for object recognition, such as human leg, are tiny in the case of long-distance shooting and are represented with only a few pixels in the image.…”
Section: A Thermal Camera Characteristic For Surveillance Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other methods that we found in the available literature are dealing with single-class (mostly pedestrians) detections [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] and do not scale the training dataset above the limit of several hundreds or a few thousand images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%