2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-device interface pressure measurement in prosthetic, orthotic and exoskeleton applications: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These human-machine coupling models with actuators are designed to replicate the neuromechanical elements of human movement [39]. The sensors can ascertain changes in task performance, muscle strength and fatigue, and environmental features, which may enable greater support for walking on diverse terrains [39,40]. Research is also expanding into the upper extremity, back, and ankle/foot exosystems [40,41], and more flexible systems with softer components than the traditional hard mechanical components of robotic devices [42].…”
Section: Technology Review and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These human-machine coupling models with actuators are designed to replicate the neuromechanical elements of human movement [39]. The sensors can ascertain changes in task performance, muscle strength and fatigue, and environmental features, which may enable greater support for walking on diverse terrains [39,40]. Research is also expanding into the upper extremity, back, and ankle/foot exosystems [40,41], and more flexible systems with softer components than the traditional hard mechanical components of robotic devices [42].…”
Section: Technology Review and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors can ascertain changes in task performance, muscle strength and fatigue, and environmental features, which may enable greater support for walking on diverse terrains [39,40]. Research is also expanding into the upper extremity, back, and ankle/foot exosystems [40,41], and more flexible systems with softer components than the traditional hard mechanical components of robotic devices [42]. Flexible systems are lighter and have less bulk, but it is not clear whether these systems can support the full weight of the lower extremities and body posture.…”
Section: Technology Review and Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of musculoskeletal extremity region tissue remains important, as injury to these regions is common and the tissue layers interface with prosthetics and exo-skeleton devices [1][2][3]. Upper and lower limbs are the two most frequently injured regions during car crashes [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sensors have been developed that can measure pressure at the socket-limb interface [ 8 , 9 ]; however, to date, these have been used to compare different prosthetics or activities, rather than to provide clinicians with information about fit during the socket design process. Furthermore, difficulties with cost, bulk, wires, and limitations in range or sensor performance have limited the translation of these systems into the clinical space for day-to-day use by prosthetists [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%