2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human exposure to a specific pulsed magnetic field: effects on thermal sensory and pain thresholds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
83
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These fMRI effects were seen after a 15-min exposure, consistent with effects seen in humans on EEG from similar length exposures (Cook et al 2005) and anti-nociception seen in snails and rodents also after 15-min exposures (Thomas et al 1997). However, in previous human studies investigating subjective relief from both acute and chronic pain, longer periods of exposure were used (Shupak et al 2004;Thomas et al 2007). Here, the short 15-min exposure did not lead to subjective effectiveness, yet the pulsed magnetic field exposure did induce significant changes in functional activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These fMRI effects were seen after a 15-min exposure, consistent with effects seen in humans on EEG from similar length exposures (Cook et al 2005) and anti-nociception seen in snails and rodents also after 15-min exposures (Thomas et al 1997). However, in previous human studies investigating subjective relief from both acute and chronic pain, longer periods of exposure were used (Shupak et al 2004;Thomas et al 2007). Here, the short 15-min exposure did not lead to subjective effectiveness, yet the pulsed magnetic field exposure did induce significant changes in functional activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Functional changes were largely detected only in central structures, which could have been anticipated by the previous work indicating that pain, but not sensory thresholds were affected (Shupak et al 2004). Some changes in the somatosensory areas were observed over time, but there was no significant interaction with magnetic field exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thomas et al [1997] found that a specific, pulsed, extremely low frequency magnetic field with a peak field of 100 mT induced antinociception in the land snail and that this was partly due to m and d opioid receptor stimulation. Similar pulsed field exposures have been investigated by this group and have been similarly found to induce opioidrelated analgesic effects in snails ], mice [Shupak et al, 2004a], and humans [Shupak et al, 2004b[Shupak et al, , 2006. Shielding the ambient magnetic field with a Mu metal box was also found to induce opioid-related analgesia in mice, although this effect took several days of 1 h exposures to manifest itself [Prato et al, 2005].…”
Section: Mechanisms: Opioidssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, low intensity magnetic fields are clinically relevant for two reasons. Firstly, in humans, fields in the millitesla range delivered to the brain induce analgesia 2527 , and alleviate depression 28 . Secondly, even though traditional rTMS is considered to be focal, magnetic fields of lower intensity are delivered outside of the focal area, raising the possibility that low intensity stimulation may be contributing to therapeutic effects by acting on interconnected brain regions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%