SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-2981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Factors Analysis of Naval Transport Aircraft Maintenance and Flight Line Related Incidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some improved methods based on HFACS have also been developed and used in industrial maintenance, the most common of which are aviation, maritime and railway (Hulme et al, 2019). Schmidt et al (1999) developed an accident investigation method (HFACS-ME) for aviation maintenance errors. Zhan et al (2017) proposed a human and organizational factor analysis (HFACS-RAS) for railway accidents.…”
Section: Human Error Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some improved methods based on HFACS have also been developed and used in industrial maintenance, the most common of which are aviation, maritime and railway (Hulme et al, 2019). Schmidt et al (1999) developed an accident investigation method (HFACS-ME) for aviation maintenance errors. Zhan et al (2017) proposed a human and organizational factor analysis (HFACS-RAS) for railway accidents.…”
Section: Human Error Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Krulak (2004) found around 60% of the aircraft mishaps due to maintenance could be traced to errors in human judgement. Studies use Human Factors Analysis and Classification system-Maintenance Extension (HFACS-ME) (Schmidt et al 1999) and refer to Generic Error-Modelling System (GEMS) (Reason and Hobbs 2003) and skill-based-rule-based-knowledge-based (SRK) models (Rasmussen 1983) to explain causal factors. Although these methods find judgemental errors leading to maintenance errors, they do not uncover the underlying cognitive mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%