2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human food choices: An examination of the factors underlying acceptance/rejection of novel and familiar animal and nonanimal foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
111
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
111
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cultural and identity dimensions of food, together with the fact that the product's constituents will enter the body as a result of biological transformations occurring after its ingestion, may accentuate this potential fear and therefore the likelihood of reticence to purchase cultured meat. Furthermore, it has been shown that disgust reactions are particularly strong towards unfamiliar foods from animal origin, mostly owing to their expected aversive textural properties and reminders of livingness or animalness (Martins and Pliner 2005).…”
Section: Criteria Shaping Consumer Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cultural and identity dimensions of food, together with the fact that the product's constituents will enter the body as a result of biological transformations occurring after its ingestion, may accentuate this potential fear and therefore the likelihood of reticence to purchase cultured meat. Furthermore, it has been shown that disgust reactions are particularly strong towards unfamiliar foods from animal origin, mostly owing to their expected aversive textural properties and reminders of livingness or animalness (Martins and Pliner 2005).…”
Section: Criteria Shaping Consumer Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research on food acceptance has focused on familiar instead of novel foods (Martins and Pliner, 2005;Pliner and Salvy, 2006). Few studies have particularly focused on the differences between food neophobic tendency and people from different countries.…”
Section: Food Neophiliamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies argue that the perception of food taste is the main reason why people are unwilling to try novel food (Arvola, Lahteenmaki, & Tuorila, 1999;Martins & Pliner, 2005;P. Pliner, Pelchat, & Grabski, 1993).…”
Section: Food Neophobia Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food neophobia has however received little attention in the tourism context, and has not been applied to traditional food consumption behaviour. The most frequent subjects of food neophobia studies are with children (Addessi et al, 2005;Birch, Francis, & Hofer, 2001;Cooke et al, 2007;Dovey et al, 2011;Pelchat & Pliner, 1995;Russell & Worsley, 2008), adults (Arvola et al, 1999;Choe & Cho, 2011;Hwang & Lin, 2010;Tuorila et al, 2001;Verbeke & Lopez, 2005) and students (Edwards, Hartwell, & Brown, 2010;Eertmans et al, 2005;Flight et al, 2003;Martins & Pliner, 2005;Olabi et al, 2009;P. Pliner et al, 1993).…”
Section: Food Neophobia Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%