2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10732-009-9107-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-guided search

Abstract: We present a survey of techniques and results from the Human-Guided Search (HuGS) project, an effort to investigate interactive optimization. HuGS provides simple and general visual metaphors relating to local search operations that allow users to guide the exploration of the search space. These metaphors apply to a wide variety of problems and combinatorial optimization algorithms, which we demonstrate by describing the HuGS toolkit and as well as eight diverse applications we developed using it. User experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that interactive approaches to optimization problems are able to surpass mere computer-based solutions (Anderson, et al 2000, Klau et al 2009), since additional knowledge of human experts can be used to further optimize a solution. An advantage of such interactive approaches is that the generated solution is better understandable and more trustworthy to the user if taken into the loop.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been demonstrated that interactive approaches to optimization problems are able to surpass mere computer-based solutions (Anderson, et al 2000, Klau et al 2009), since additional knowledge of human experts can be used to further optimize a solution. An advantage of such interactive approaches is that the generated solution is better understandable and more trustworthy to the user if taken into the loop.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the authors state that a so called Optimization Table allows for several users to interact with the system, no additional information is given on how this type of interaction looks like in an actual application. Lesh et al (2005) extend the HuGS platform to the domain of packing problems and make three types of actions available for human guidance (Klau et al 2009): (1) manual selection of the next move, (2) invocation, monitoring, and halting the search process, and (3) reverting to a previous solution. Kopfer and Schönberger (2002) suggest a framework for interactive problem solving with focus on vehicle routing and scheduling problems in.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have proposed method to apply TS to IEC candidate solutions retrieval [14], [15]. Klau et al have proposed a human-guided TS method covering the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Scheduling Problem (SP) as interactive optimization problems [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klau et al have proposed a human-guided TS method covering the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and the Scheduling Problem (SP) as interactive optimization problems [14]. Munemoto et al have proposed an interactive multi-objective optimization method using TS for a floor layout [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this fashion, the SLS may be redesigned to extend beyond the initial configuration space. Examples of white-box approaches include Statistical Analysis (Fitness Distance Correlation Analysis, Run Time Distribution, etc) [3,8], Sequential Parameter Optimization [9], Human Guided Tabu Search [10], Visualization of Search Process [11,12], V-MDF and Viz [5,[13][14][15], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%