Human handedness: A meta-analysis.

Abstract

Across time and place, right hand preference has been the norm, but what is the precise prevalence of left-and right-handedness? Frequency of left-handedness has shaped and underpinned different fields of research, from cognitive neuroscience to human evolution, but reliable distributional estimates are still lacking. While hundreds of empirical studies have assessed handedness, a large-scale, comprehensive review of the prevalence of handedness and the factors which moderate it, is currently missing. Here, we report five meta-analyses on hand preference for different manual tasks and show that left-handedness prevalence lies between 9.3% (using the most stringent criterion of left-handedness) to 18.1% (using the most lenient criterion of non-right-handedness), with the best overall estimate being 10.6% (10.4% when excluding studies assessing elite athletes' handedness). Handedness variability depends on (a) study characteristics, namely year of publication and ways to measure and classify handedness, and (b) participant characteristics, namely sex and ancestry. Our analysis identifies the role of moderators which require taking into account in future studies on handedness and hemispheric asymmetries. We argue that the same evolutionary mechanisms should apply across geographical regions to maintain the roughly 1:10 ratio, while cultural factors, such as pressure against left-hand use, moderate the magnitude of the prevalence of left-handedness. Although handedness appears as a straightforward trait, there is no universal agreement on how to assess it. Therefore, we urge researchers to fully report study and participant characteristics as well as the detailed procedure by which handedness was assessed and make raw data publicly available.

Prevalence and heritability of handedness in a Hong Kong Chinese twin and singleton sample

“…Our results show that, using a binary classification of writing hand as the criterion, around 8% of schoolaged children are left-handers. This estimate is lower than the most recently published value of 10.6% for the general left-handedness prevalence [11], but still higher than what was previously reported in Chinese. A 1980s survey found that less than 1% Chinese students were left-handed writers [24].…”

“…Hand preference for writing can be easily collected as a tick-box questionnaire leading to large datasets. A recent meta-analysis estimated that the prevalence of left-hand preference in the general population is 10.6% based on data from over 2 million of people [11]. The study also confirmed the effect of some factors influencing hand preference including age, sex, and ethnicity reported in previous research.…”

“…In addition, very few studies have looked at the heritability estimates for handedness in populations of non-European ancestry. The prevalence of left-handedness has been consistently reported to be lower in Asia compared to Europe and North America [11,20,21]. This difference could be explained by both population-specific genetic and cultural factors.…”

Different laterality indexes are poorly correlated with one another but consistently show the tendency of males and females to be more left- and right-lateralized, respectively

“…In fact, it is well established that environmental pressures might force the use of the right hand for writing in left handers [13]. This phenomenon was mainly observed in past generations, and still applies to some cultures [1,14]. The EHI, similarly to other handedness questionnaires, leads to scores with a J-shaped distribution, indicating that the majority of people present an overall right-or left-hand preference with a few individuals in between.…”

“…Worldwide, the vast majority of people (roughly 90%) prefer using the right hand for most tasks in contrast to a minority of about 10% who prefer the left hand [1,2]. The 1 : 9 left to right ratio for hand preference is a feature specific to humans and is observed across populations.…”