2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02461-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to that reported at the Salt River Mortuary in Cape Town (9.2%) [ 17 ]. A similar trend has been reported internationally, such as in Australia’s Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine who reported that 9% of their cases require primary and secondary methods of identification, since visual identification was not possible [ 9 ]. The Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology (University Hospital R. Poincaré, Garches, France), who performs forensic autopsies of the west area of Paris, reported 9.1% of their cases as unidentified or of “dubious identity” [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to that reported at the Salt River Mortuary in Cape Town (9.2%) [ 17 ]. A similar trend has been reported internationally, such as in Australia’s Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine who reported that 9% of their cases require primary and secondary methods of identification, since visual identification was not possible [ 9 ]. The Department of Forensic Medicine and Pathology (University Hospital R. Poincaré, Garches, France), who performs forensic autopsies of the west area of Paris, reported 9.1% of their cases as unidentified or of “dubious identity” [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The deceased may be visually identified by a spouse, partner, major child, parent, guardian, major brother, major sister, caregiver, or any person with personal knowledge of the deceased. Visual identification is considered an acceptable method of identification and is the most commonly used method internationally [ 9 – 11 ]. This is due to the pragmatic and time-saving benefits of visual identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review of human identification methods employed within the Australian coronial death investigation system, 91% of individuals admitted to the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine (VIFM) between 2015 and 2020 (comprising 30,054 cases) were visually identified. The remaining 9% required identification using other primary methods, DNA being the second most common form of identification (Blau et al, 2021). Relative to forensic identification, Bennett (2020) recently questioned whether DNA is "always the answer" and provides an important reminder that there are frequently situations where DNA analyses are unavailable or inappropriate due to lack of technical and logistical expertise, financial constraints, degraded material and cultural sensitivities (among other factors).…”
Section: Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to achieve the positive identification of skeletal remains, the specific type of DNA targeted [nuclear and mitochondrial] is largely dependent on availability of the family reference sample and the preservation of the postmortem remains. There are two main sources of the former: (i) biological samples from the unidentified/missing person(s), such as blood (including neonatal screening cards), skin or hair follicles; and (ii) biological samples, such as blood or buccal swabs, from biological relatives (Blau, 2020;Blau et al, 2021). DNA can be acquired from soft tissue if decomposition is not advanced, or from skeletal tissues (bone and/or dental) and not compromised peri-or postmortem (Goodwin et al, 2020;Higgins & Austin, 2013;Owen et al, 2013;Turingan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the medical-legal investigation of a death, the post-mortem identification process is carried out in an integrated way. Its results have great legal and humanitarian importance both when major catastrophes occur and in routine forensic practice [ 1 ]. One of the top priorities is the identification of human remains, which must be carried out using a strict scientific-technical procedure to allow their identity to be established accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%