1992
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.66.12.7469-7480.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev activation can be achieved without Rev-responsive element RNA if Rev is directed to the target as a Rev/MS2 fusion protein which tethers the MS2 operator RNA

Abstract: The posttranscriptional tinns activation of unspliced or partially spliced human immunodeficiency virus RNAs by the Rev regulatory protein is crucial for virus replication and is dependent on sequence-specific RNA binding by Rev. The cognate RNA target of Rev is contained within a highly structured, 244-nucleotide Rev-responsive element (RRE) RNA in the viral env gene. Here, we show that specific interaction with the RRE is not an absolute requirement for Rev function. When the RRE is replaced by a heterologou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a lower-affinity Rev binding site in domain I (12). Numerous observations indicate that, although single Rev molecules can bind to an unoccupied RRE (3,17,18), the interaction of multiple Rev molecules with a single RRE is required for productive Rev-RRE interactions (14,25,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a lower-affinity Rev binding site in domain I (12). Numerous observations indicate that, although single Rev molecules can bind to an unoccupied RRE (3,17,18), the interaction of multiple Rev molecules with a single RRE is required for productive Rev-RRE interactions (14,25,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is supported by the observation that the activation induced by a Rev-MS2 fusion protein tethered to the MS2 operator sequence was markedly increased if the MS2 RNA target was inserted in the context of RRE sequences. This enhancement was mediated rather by the structure than by the sequence of the RRE (Venkatesan et al, 1992). The negative effects induced by deletion of RexRE structures different from SW therefore can be explained by perturbation of an optimal context resulting in decreased stability of the RNA-binding site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An alternative explanation could be that the monomer does not form a correct secondary structure in the context of the test systems used. The context of an RNA target was demonstrated to have strong influence on its capacity to mediate the regulatory effect of an RNA binding protein (Venkatesan et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, YL2 or p32 (YL2/p32) interacts with the basic domain of Rev, which is important not only for its binding to the RRE but also for its effects on RNA splicing in vitro (32,33). Indeed, even when Rev is targeted to viral RNAs via a heterologous RNA-binding protein (MS2), a basic sequence is still required for the optimal function of Rev (45,50). Thus, it is not surprising that YL2 also potentiated the activities of Rex on the XRE and the hybrid Tat-Rev and Rev-MS2 proteins on their respective RNA targets (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%