1993
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560021216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human immunodeficiency virus type‐1 reverse transcriptase and ribonuclease h as substrates of the viral protease

Abstract: A study has been made of the susceptibility of recombinant constructs of reverse transcriptase (RT) and ribonuclease H (RNase H) from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to digestion by the HIV-1 protease. At neutral pH, the protease attacks a single peptide bond, Phe440-Tyr441, in one of the protomers of the folded, active RT/RNase H (p66/p66) homodimer to give a stable, active heterodimer (~6 6 1~5 1 ) that is resistant to further hydrolysis (Chattopadhyay, D., et al., 1992, J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14227… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 6 and Table 2, we conclude that the two subunits in p66/p66 homodimer are not symmetrically related, presumably as a result of partial unfolding of the C-terminal p15 RNase H domain in one of the p66 protomers. This conclusion is consistent with our recent comparative studies on the susceptibility of ~661~66 homodimer and the active p15 RNase H domain to digestion by HIV-l protease [19]. The origin of conformational differences in the two p66 subunits, as elaborated by peaks 1 and 2 of Fig.…”
Section: Sk Sharma Et Al Ifebs Letters 343 (1994) 125-i-130supporting
confidence: 92%
“…2 and 6 and Table 2, we conclude that the two subunits in p66/p66 homodimer are not symmetrically related, presumably as a result of partial unfolding of the C-terminal p15 RNase H domain in one of the p66 protomers. This conclusion is consistent with our recent comparative studies on the susceptibility of ~661~66 homodimer and the active p15 RNase H domain to digestion by HIV-l protease [19]. The origin of conformational differences in the two p66 subunits, as elaborated by peaks 1 and 2 of Fig.…”
Section: Sk Sharma Et Al Ifebs Letters 343 (1994) 125-i-130supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The survey included proteases from the following viruses: HIV-1, HIV-2, AMV (avian myeloblastosis virus), RSV (Rous sarcoma virus), HTLV-1 (human T cell leukemia virus type 1), BLV (bovine leukemia virus), Mo-MuLV (Moloney murine leukemia virus), EIAV (equine infectious anemia virus), and FIV (feline immunodeficiency virus); its outcome is summarized in Tables S1 and S2. In some cases fully denaturated proteins had been exposed to HIV-1 or HIV-2 proteases [61,62,64]. Noncleavable octapeptides were in these cases extracted from the noncleavable fragments located between the observed cleavage sites by using an eight-residue-long sliding window.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This preference was predicted to be because of hydrogen bonding of the side chain carboxyl to the backbone NH of residues 29Ј and 30Ј of the enzyme (11). Also, P 2 Ј Glu is frequently found in viral and cellular protein cleavage sites of HIV-1 proteinase (33). At the P 2 -P 2 Ј region the type 1 substrate used by Griffith et al (11) contained residues (-Asn-Tyr*ProIle-) identical to those in SP-211; however, P 2 Ј Glu substitution FIG.…”
Section: Substitutions In a Palindromic Substrate Sequencementioning
confidence: 96%