2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/dr8qn
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Intelligence and General Collective Intelligence as Phase Changes in Animal Intelligence

Abstract: The hypothesis that human intelligence represents a phase transition in animal intelligence is explored, as is the hypothesis that General Collective Intelligence (GCI), which has been defined as a system that organizes groups into a single collective cognition with the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability than that of any individual in the group, represents a phase transition in human intelligence. At these phase transitions, cognition can be demonstrated to gain the capacity for expon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, GCI is a system that organizes individuals to have the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability (intelligence), than any individual. GCI is a well-defined phase change from human intelligence [1]. From this functional perspective, a problem is a gap between two points in the conceptual space.…”
Section: Defining General Problem-solving Ability and Solvability Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…That is, GCI is a system that organizes individuals to have the potential for vastly greater general problem-solving ability (intelligence), than any individual. GCI is a well-defined phase change from human intelligence [1]. From this functional perspective, a problem is a gap between two points in the conceptual space.…”
Section: Defining General Problem-solving Ability and Solvability Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…required to define a solution) is sufficiently high that those interactions cannot be found (i.e. are no longer understandable within any individual human cognition), those interactions have been described as "higher order" (too complex) [1]. Since the number of relationships between concepts that must be navigated to define a concept is related to the size (resolution) of a concept in conceptual space, then visually, the limits to complexity are represented in conceptual space as the minimum resolvable volume for any concept, and the minimum resolvable distance between concepts.…”
Section: Defining General Problem-solving Ability and Solvability Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As explored in the domain of sustainable housing design, any design process faces limits to the complexity it has the capacity to navigate [11]. Similarly, in the computing domain, where computing methods designed by any individual human without AGI, or by any group without GCI can only define the problems that can fit inside human cognition, and can only solve those problems with the solutions that are discoverable within human cognition, the combination of AGI and GCI can be demonstrated to have the capacity to reliably generate an exponential increase in general problem-solving ability [12]. Measured in impact on any outcome, such as the outcomes targeted through the design of computing methods, this can be expected to drive an exponential increase in impact on those outcomes.…”
Section: Why Consider Agi and Gci As A Basis For Navigating Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%