2001
DOI: 10.1079/ahrr200121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human intestinal spirochetosis diagnosed with colonoscopy and analysis of partial 16S rDNA sequences of involved spirochetes

Abstract: DNA was extracted from colonic biopsies of 33 patients with and three without evidence of intestinal spirochetosis (IS) in the large bowel. The biopsies were subjected to PCR. A pair of primers, generating a 207 bp fragment, were designed to detect specifically the 16S rDNA gene ofBrachyspira. PCR products of the expected size were obtained from 33 samples with histologic evidence of IS. The PCR amplicons were used for sequencing. The sequences obtained were aligned to the corresponding 16S rRNA sequences of f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study caused some controversy, as it implied not just that there were multiple strains and genetic clusters of B. aalborgi, but also, for the first time, that individuals could harbour multiple different strains of B. aalborgi, as well as related but uncharacterized spirochaetes. In a subsequent study, partial (207 bp) sequences of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified from colonic biopsies taken from 33 patients (Kraaz et al, 2001). Although the small size of the sequence did not allow robust phylogenetic analysis, the results broadly supported the existence of strain variation in B. aalborgi, as well as the presence of several clusters of B. aalborgi-like spirochaetes, which were identified in different individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study caused some controversy, as it implied not just that there were multiple strains and genetic clusters of B. aalborgi, but also, for the first time, that individuals could harbour multiple different strains of B. aalborgi, as well as related but uncharacterized spirochaetes. In a subsequent study, partial (207 bp) sequences of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified from colonic biopsies taken from 33 patients (Kraaz et al, 2001). Although the small size of the sequence did not allow robust phylogenetic analysis, the results broadly supported the existence of strain variation in B. aalborgi, as well as the presence of several clusters of B. aalborgi-like spirochaetes, which were identified in different individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This lack of information has hampered attempts to find links between colonization with specific strains of B. aalborgi and the development of intestinal symptoms. To circumvent the problem of a lack of isolates, it is possible to use PCR to amplify B. aalborgi gene sequences directly from colonized tissue and/or faeces (Mikosza et al, 1999(Mikosza et al, , 2001aKraaz et al, 2001) and then to examine these sequences for heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first study to provide an estimate of the prevalence of B. aalborgi in the general population of a developing country. Unfortunately, there have been no studies on the prevalence of B. aalborgi in developed countries, apart from in selected groups of patients who have undergone colorectal biopsy for underlying complaints of the large bowel [21,[25][26][27][28]. In the absence of this comparative data, it is not possible to determine whether the prevalence of colonization that was detected is unusually high or low, or whether it was influenced by factors peculiar to developing countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, DNA has been extracted from colorectal biopsies taken from IS patients in Australia, Scandinavia and the United States, and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or hybridized with oligonucleotide probes. Somewhat unexpectedly, these studies showed that B. aalborgi is much more commonly involved in IS in these developed countries than is B. pilosicoli [21,[25][26][27][28]. Similar studies have not been conducted on patients in developing countries, where B. pilosicoli is known to be common, due to difficulties in accessing suitable samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of Brachyspira spp. were performed as described by Kraatz et al [4]. Genus-specific primers targeting 16S rDNA were used in PCR and species determination was performed by sequencing of the PCR amplicons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%