2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.19.492650
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human intracranial pulsatility during the cardiac cycle: a computational modelling framework

Abstract: BackgroundToday’s availability of medical imaging and computational resources set the scene for high-fidelity computational modelling of brain biomechanics. The brain and its environment feature a dynamic and complex interplay between the tissue, blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF). Here, we design a computational platform for modelling and simulation of intracranial dynamics, and assess the models’ validity in terms of clinically relevant indicators of brain pulsatility.MethodsWe dev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 9. The total pressure formulation of the MPET equations is also advantageous when considering the fluid-structure interaction between the poroelastic brain and the CSF that surrounds it and clinical applications (Figure 4) [6]. The intracranial pressure, a key clinical measure, can be interpreted as the total pressure in the parenchyma and the hydrostatic pressure in the CSF.…”
Section: Brain-csf Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 9. The total pressure formulation of the MPET equations is also advantageous when considering the fluid-structure interaction between the poroelastic brain and the CSF that surrounds it and clinical applications (Figure 4) [6]. The intracranial pressure, a key clinical measure, can be interpreted as the total pressure in the parenchyma and the hydrostatic pressure in the CSF.…”
Section: Brain-csf Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We addressed this goal by designing and introducing mathematical software concepts together with lower-level algorithms for expressing, representing, and solving systems of PDEs coupled across interfaces or subdomains (Figure 8) [10]. These tools enable automated assembly and solution of a wide range of mixed finite element variational formulations, such as, e.g., the finite element spaces and formulations involved in the reduced perivascular flow models (10), interactions across the cell membrane in geometrically resolved models of excitable tissue [16,35] or fluid-structure interfaces [6]. All algorithms are publicly and openly available via the FEniCS Project software [2,10].…”
Section: Computational Abstractions and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%