2021
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2020.3036984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Driving: A Noncooperative Game Theoretic Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decision making in autonomous vehicles (AVs) has been addressed in several works; for example, the authors in [ 10 ] developed an approach to mimic human behavior. A variety of driving styles were considered to study driving safety, ride comfort, and travel efficiency as utility functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision making in autonomous vehicles (AVs) has been addressed in several works; for example, the authors in [ 10 ] developed an approach to mimic human behavior. A variety of driving styles were considered to study driving safety, ride comfort, and travel efficiency as utility functions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential field is an effective method to model the dynamics of the vehicle and describe its interaction with surrounding obstacles. In [88], a human-like decision making framework for autonomous vehicles is proposed, where the potential field method and MPC are used to plan the collision-avoidance path and provide predicted motion states for the human-like decision making module. An integrated framework to deal with the decision making and motion planning is presented in [89] for lanechange maneuvers, while considering social behaviors of surrounding traffic participants.…”
Section: Motion Planning By Mpc For a Single Agvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many advanced algorithms have been proposed to overcome the defects of the sensors [ 16 , 17 ]. However, these algorithms are always limited to particular scenarios, e.g., lane changing [ 18 ] and turning [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%