2020
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Lower Limb Joint Biomechanics in Daily Life Activities: A Literature Based Requirement Analysis for Anthropomorphic Robot Design

Abstract: Daily human activity is characterized by a broad variety of movement tasks. This work summarizes the sagittal hip, knee, and ankle joint biomechanics for a broad range of daily movements, based on previously published literature, to identify requirements for robotic design. Maximum joint power, moment, angular velocity, and angular acceleration, as well as the movement-related range of motion and the mean absolute power were extracted, compared, and analyzed for essential and sportive movement tasks. We found … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the contributions of this study are: 1) assessing the linear interlimb coordination variability of participants in the three different functional tasks, 2) assessing the nonlinear interlimb coordination variability, 3) comparing the linear and nonlinear interlimb coordination variability of the participants in the functional tasks with increasing difficulty and complexity 4) assessing the effect of leg dominance on the shank-thigh coordination variability in the three different tasks. The three functional tasks in this study have been selected as they have similar knee extension-flexion motion and due to their application in clinical settings (McQuade and De Oliveira, 2011) (Jonsson and Kärrholm, 1994), as assessments of lowerlimb strength (Waldhelm et al, 2020), or due to their similarities to activities of daily living (Grimmer et al, 2020). The results of this study indicate that participants displayed different results in their linear and nonlinear coordination variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the contributions of this study are: 1) assessing the linear interlimb coordination variability of participants in the three different functional tasks, 2) assessing the nonlinear interlimb coordination variability, 3) comparing the linear and nonlinear interlimb coordination variability of the participants in the functional tasks with increasing difficulty and complexity 4) assessing the effect of leg dominance on the shank-thigh coordination variability in the three different tasks. The three functional tasks in this study have been selected as they have similar knee extension-flexion motion and due to their application in clinical settings (McQuade and De Oliveira, 2011) (Jonsson and Kärrholm, 1994), as assessments of lowerlimb strength (Waldhelm et al, 2020), or due to their similarities to activities of daily living (Grimmer et al, 2020). The results of this study indicate that participants displayed different results in their linear and nonlinear coordination variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, technologies such as prostheses [ 6 , 7 ] or lower limb exoskeletons [ 8 – 11 ] can be used to regain the user’s ability of stair ambulation. Designing the hardware for these wearable lower limb robotics is likely to require the specification of the peak joint moments, the joint range of motion, and the average power [ 12 ]. Additionally, high-level robotic control requires information about the current and upcoming movement tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cycle time of 1.5 s seems reasonable for a variety of load handling and manipulation tasks. However, different lifting techniques (e.g., squat, stoop) were found to require about 1.3 s 26 . At this point, it is unclear what the optimal torque assistance profiles should look like for such dynamic movements, and how much users could benefit from sub-optimal assistance torques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with locomotion capabilities can instead use minimalistic and lightweight designs 22 , 23 , as additional weight in general, and especially increased weight at the limbs (inertia), will increase user effort 24 . Soft structures, as used in the exosuit concept 18 , 22 , 25 , seem promising to assist distal lower limb joints in daily tasks 26 . To minimize inertia-related increases of effort, exosuit actuators (motors) are placed near the body’s center of mass and Bowden cables are placed in parallel to the human muscles to transfer the assisting torques to the joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%