Human mating strategies: from past causes to present consequences

Abstract

In both humans and nonhuman animals, mating strategies represent a set of evolutionary adaptations aimed at promoting individual fitness by means of reproduction with the best possible partners. Given this critical role, mating strategies influence numerous aspects of human life. In particular, between-sex divergence in the intensity of intrasexual competition could account for robust cross-cultural sex differences in psychology and behavior (e.g., personality, psychiatric disorders, social behavior, violence). Several other factors (including individual differences, relationship type and environment) affect-in an evolutionarily consistent manner-variation in mating strategy that individuals pursue (as one example, awareness of one's own attractiveness impinges on mating standards). Here we provide an overview of relevant theoretical frameworks and empirical evidence on variation in mating strategies. Given its multifaceted nature and intense research interest over several decades, this is a challenging task, and we highlight areas where further investigation is warranted in order to achieve a clearer picture and resolve apparent inconsistencies. However, we suggest that addressing outstanding questions using a variety of different methodological approaches, a deeper understanding of the cognitive representations involved in mating strategies is within reach. WIREs Cogn Sci 2018, 9:e1456. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1456 This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Evolutionary Roots of Cognition Neuroscience > Behavior Neuroscience > Cognition.

The battle between light and dark side of personality: How light and dark personality traits predict mating strategies in the online context

“…Finally, sex of the participant explained a significant amount of variance in short-term mating, with men expressing a stronger orientation to short-term mating compared to women. This supports previous research (e.g., Buss, 2013;Buss & Schmitt, 2019;Marzoli, Havlíček, & Roberts, 2018), and indicates participant's sex may play a significantly more important role in short-term mating compared to dark personality traits.…”

How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world

“…One may argue that these associations might in fact be stronger if we further specify the attractiveness ratings such as sexual or long-term partner attractiveness. While we agree that such approach is useful when working within a specific society, the same cannot be said for cross-cultural research with highly variable types of relationships 98 , 99 . Based on two competing perspectives, the more masculine men should be either preferred in harsher environments (vs favorable environments) or in large-scale urban societies (vs small-scale rural societies).…”

Women's career in Vietnamese academia: An analysis from multiple lenses

“…Typical examples of the areas of research that endorse 'nature' argument are sociobiology (Buss, 1994;Buss & Schmitt, 1993;Marzoli, Havlíček, & Roberts, 2018;E. O. Wilson, 1975) and cognitive biology (Hines, 1982(Hines, , 2008Van Goozen et al, 1995).…”

“…Researchers of sociobiology assume that the behaviours of both animals and humans are driven by survival instinct, that is, the desire to pass their genes on to the next generations (Lindsey, 2016;Lips, 2019). As a result, in the evolutionary process of increasing survival rate across generations, males and females have different strategies in mating and caring for offspring (Buss, 1994;Buss & Schmitt, 1993;Marzoli et al, 2018;E. O. Wilson, 1975).…”