2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-mediated shifts in animal habitat use: Sequential changes in pronghorn use of a natural gas field in Greater Yellowstone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in Wyoming could experience up to 60% habitat loss through avoidance of high-density natural gas drilling operations (Sawyer et al, 2009). Similarly, pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) were predicted to experience a five-fold reduction in high-value habitat as a result of natural gas facilities (Beckmann et al, 2012). Compared to these losses, the amount of habitat we expect to be lost as a FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) in Wyoming could experience up to 60% habitat loss through avoidance of high-density natural gas drilling operations (Sawyer et al, 2009). Similarly, pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) were predicted to experience a five-fold reduction in high-value habitat as a result of natural gas facilities (Beckmann et al, 2012). Compared to these losses, the amount of habitat we expect to be lost as a FIG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural gas exploration has been the primary focus of that research because of the recent expansion of exploration across the western United States (Sawyer et al 2006, Sawyer et al 2009a, Beckmann et al 2012, Lendrum et al 2012, Lendrum et al 2013, Sawyer et al 2013, Buchanan et al 2014, Seidler et al 2014. Research in these areas suggests that mule deer increase their movement rates, select habitat types that provide greater amounts of concealment cover, reduce stopover use, and migration route use and width decreased when migrating through areas with high densities of well pads (Lendrum et al 2012, Lendrum et al 2013, Sawyer et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On winter range, mule deer avoided areas with natural gas fields and shifted habitat use away from disturbance (Sawyer et al 2006, Sawyer et al 2009a). In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, researchers reported that pronghorn antelope (Antilocapra Americana) moved slower through disturbances, avoided patches with high levels of natural gas fields, and that these disturbances created ''hazardinduced stopovers'' where individuals used stopover locations with low greenness estimates (Beckmann et al 2012, Seidler et al 2014. Similarly, North American elk (Cervus elaphus) responded to the development of natural gas fields and increased traffic by shifting habitat use farther away from roads, and by selecting for areas with higher amounts of concealment cover (Cole et al 1997, Buchanan et al 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aplicar el conocimiento sobre el uso de las áreas estacionales importantes y sobre el uso de las rutas durante la migración durante la planificación de la conservación futura, pueden mitigar el impacto en el hábitat del antílope americano y contribuir a su conservación a largo plazo. behavioral changes and reductions in carrying capacity across their range due to decreased habitat and fragmentation of migration routes as a result of development, fencing, and other land-use practices (e.g., Sawyer et al 2005, Boccadori et al 2008, Beckmann et al 2012, Seidler et al 2014. The challenge of conserving migratory ungulates is due to their wide-ranging seasonal movements, which occur across both a diversity of ecosystems and varying land management priorities (Copeland et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%