Human modification of land cover alters net primary productivity, species richness and their relationship

Abstract

AimHumans have altered ecosystem productivity and biodiversity worldwide by changing land‐cover types and management. High local species richness is commonly found in geographic areas and ecosystems with high net primary productivity (NPP), but the long‐term effects of modification on productivity and biodiversity change, and particularly on the relationship between the two, are poorly understood. Here we evaluate whether human modification tends to increase biodiversity in low‐productivity ecosystems (where human management is likely to increase productivity) and decrease biodiversity in ecosystems that were originally high‐productive.LocationGlobal.Time Period2001–2013.Major Taxa StudiedPlants, mammals, birds, hexapods, arachnids, other terrestrial invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles and fungi.MethodsWe assembled a large worldwide dataset of NPP and associated species richness from MODIS land cover and NPP products and the PREDICTS biodiversity database, involving 11,849 sites. This enabled comparisons of species richness and NPP differences between samples of relatively natural and human‐modified vegetation within the same geographic regions, considering 102 types of land‐cover transitions.Results(1) Modification from non‐forest vegetation to forests on average increased NPP by 7.76%, and vice versa. (2) Human modification of less productive areas tended to increase NPP and vice versa, with stronger effects of major modification. (3) However, site‐level species richness decreases were associated with nearly all land‐cover transitions from relatively natural to modified vegetation. (4) Despite expectations, we found no significant relationship between species richness differences (between relatively natural and modified vegetation) and productivity differences, when considering conversions across land‐cover types and excluding human‐appropriated productivity in croplands.Main ConclusionsHuman modification tends to increase NPP in low‐productivity ecosystems, but species richness declines are associated with most major human‐induced land‐cover changes. Therefore, increasing or decreasing NPP did not generate corresponding increases or decreases in species richness, contrary to expectations of the general species richness‐productivity relationship.

Land-use impacts on plant functional diversity throughout Europe

“…Furthermore, a global review of land-use effects on plant species richness found a positive trend in managed grasslands compared to natural habitats (Gerstner et al 2014). Additionally, recent research indicates that global median species richness may either increase or remain stable when comparing different types of natural forests (namely, natural deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen needleleaf forests, and mixed forests, which are the same natural forests considered in our study) to minor or major human modification (Deng et al 2024). Furthermore, Flynn et al .…”

Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program on Vegetation Net Primary Productivity over the Past Two Decades and Its Environmental Benefits in China

“…The contribution of construction land expansion (artificial greening) for construction purposes is 5.4%. Since the inception of the second phase of the TNSFP in 2001, there has been a gradual vegetation recovery and a notable enhancement in the ecological environment, exemplified by the decline in PM2.5 levels and the augmentation of soil conservation efforts [69][70][71].…”