2011
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Ocular Infection with Dirofilaria repens (Railliet and Henry, 1911) in an Area Endemic for Canine Dirofilariasis

Abstract: Abstract. Dirofilaria repens , which is usually found in canine subcutaneous tissues, is the main causative agent of human dirofilariasis in the Old Word. However, a relationship between animal and human cases of dirofilariasis caused by D. repens in a given area has never been demonstrated. The uneven distribution of D. repens in provinces in Sicily, Italy represented the foundation for this study. We report a human case of ocular infection with D. repens from Trapani Province, where canine dirofilariasis is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pain in the eye, redness and swelling of eyelids represent symptoms that occurred in our patient and most patients with ocular dirofilariosis (Koltas et al, 2002;Yehudit et al, 2006;Raniel et al, 2006;Janjetović et al, 2010;Khoramnia & Wegner, 2010;Wesolowska et al, 2010). As observed by other authors, visual status usually remained intact after surgical removal of the worm (Koltas et al, 2002;Maraghi et al, 2006;Mittal et al, 2008;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011a;Otranto et al, 2011b). Diagnosis of human dirofilariosis is primarily based on histological evaluation of infected tissue and the macroscopic characteristics of the worm (Rouhani & Athari, 2003;Nath et al, 2010;Tafti et al, 2010;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pain in the eye, redness and swelling of eyelids represent symptoms that occurred in our patient and most patients with ocular dirofilariosis (Koltas et al, 2002;Yehudit et al, 2006;Raniel et al, 2006;Janjetović et al, 2010;Khoramnia & Wegner, 2010;Wesolowska et al, 2010). As observed by other authors, visual status usually remained intact after surgical removal of the worm (Koltas et al, 2002;Maraghi et al, 2006;Mittal et al, 2008;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011a;Otranto et al, 2011b). Diagnosis of human dirofilariosis is primarily based on histological evaluation of infected tissue and the macroscopic characteristics of the worm (Rouhani & Athari, 2003;Nath et al, 2010;Tafti et al, 2010;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…As observed by other authors, visual status usually remained intact after surgical removal of the worm (Koltas et al, 2002;Maraghi et al, 2006;Mittal et al, 2008;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011a;Otranto et al, 2011b). Diagnosis of human dirofilariosis is primarily based on histological evaluation of infected tissue and the macroscopic characteristics of the worm (Rouhani & Athari, 2003;Nath et al, 2010;Tafti et al, 2010;Argy et al, 2011;Otranto et al, 2011b). Confirmation of morphological identification and definite diagnosis of D. repens is possible by DNA analysis with polymerase chain reaction (Vakalis et al, 1999) and primers for a highly specific portion of COI gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We chose the cox1 gene for genetic characterization of the Dirofilaria isolates in our study because this gene can reliably differentiate between different species of filariae, and it has also been used for the identification of Dirofilaria in previous studies (7,9,12,20,22,30). The reported mean nucleotide distance of the cox1 gene within species ranges from 0% to 2% (9), and there is less than 1% difference between available D. repens sequences in the GenBank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this nematode has a zoonotic potential and the human infection usually presents with subcutaneous nodules, pruriginous urticarioid patches, transient swellings and eosinophilia, although photophobia, conjunctival irritation and nodules or cysts in the eye or in the periocular tissues have also been reported [7, 8]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%