“…In addition, few studies randomly selected participants for inclusion from a comprehensive list of the target population (n=26, 23%) ( 18 , 21 , 24 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 44 , 45 , 83 , 92 , 104 , 108 , 109 , 111 – 113 , 115 – 119 , 121 , 124 , 126 , 127 ). This contributed to most studies being classified as ‘moderate’ for selection bias (n=99, 87%) ( 4 , 15 – 26 , 28 – 33 , 35 – 43 , 46 – 49 , 51 – 58 , 60 – 77 , 79 – 82 , 84 – 91 , 93 – 103 , 105 – 107 , 109 – 116 , 118 – 123 , 125 ). For data collection within synchronous and asynchronous HPV testing studies, some studies did not specify an HPV infection sample collection method, so the validity and reliability were unknown or they relied on self-reported HPV infections (n=10/92, 11%) ( 4 , 33 , 40 , 55 , 63 , 64 , 73 , 94 , 99 , 101 ).…”