Infection with a group of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) has been identified as the cause of cervical cancer; thus, high-risk HPV testing is being incorporated into cervical cancer screening to improve cervical cancer prevention. Recently released U.S. guidelines recommend cotesting with HPV assays and cytology (1) as an alternative to the use of cytology alone. Moreover, primary stand-alone HPV testing is being introduced in multiple regions (2), including the United States (3). As a major advantage, HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology alone, and a negative HPV test result provides prolonged reassurance against cervical cancer, permitting the safe lengthening of screening intervals (4, 5).As a disadvantage, HPV testing is less specific than cytology, and optimal management is unclear for some of the nonnormal cytology/HPV combined results that occur with HPV testing, whether in the context of cotesting or primary HPV testing followed by cytology triage of HPV-positive women (6, 7). One prominent issue, that of HPV-positive/cytology-negative results, i.e., the finding of positive HPV test results when cytology result is negative, is common in absolute terms. For example, HPV-positive/cytology-negative results were found in nearly 4% of the cotest results in a recent large series of approximately 1 million women age 30 to 64 years at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) (8, 9).The decision of how to manage HPV-positive/cytology-negative results is not straightforward. Recently, U.S. consensus guideline groups have issued recommended management strategies based on comparisons of the risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cancer (CIN3ϩ, including adenocarcinoma in situ). These consensus guidelines form the basis for the consistent management of women with similar risks. Specifically, for women with HPV-positive/cytology-negative results, the attendant risk is not quite high enough for immediate colposcopy (1, 10). In comparison, immediate colposcopy is recommended for cytologically evident HPV infection (HPV-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US] or lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]) (10). Cytologically evident HPV infection confers a 5-year risk of CIN3ϩ that is only slightly higher than that for HPV-positive/cytology-negative results. However, referring all women with HPV-positive/cytologynegative results would more than double the number of colposcopic procedures, and many of those women would not yet have colposcopically diagnosable lesions (8).Thus, the guidelines recommend managing HPV-positive/cy-