2004
DOI: 10.1260/0957456041589836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Performance under the Impact of Continuous and Intermittent Noise in a Manual Machining Task

Abstract: Experimental research was conducted to determine the performance of operators while carrying out industrial tasks in the presence of continuous and intermittent noise. Experimental investigations were carried out at 90, 95, 100 and 105 dB (A) for both types of noise. Two groups of subjects, one having a working experience of 2-7 years and other with 7-12 years were selected for the two studies. The number of units produced was taken as the measure of human performance. The results of the study showed that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, no significant relationship was observed between the conditions of creating the sound levels and doing manual activities, which was in line with the study conducted by Taylor (2004), which showed no difference between one and multiple sources of creating sound levels in doing easy or hard visual activities ( 26 ). Overall, in line with the study conducted by Muzammil in 2002, the findings of our study confirmed the effect of noise on performance ( 27 ). If the safety issues are not observed in industrial factories and workshops where the workers are exposed to noise generated by the equipment, performance and productivity will decrease significantly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, no significant relationship was observed between the conditions of creating the sound levels and doing manual activities, which was in line with the study conducted by Taylor (2004), which showed no difference between one and multiple sources of creating sound levels in doing easy or hard visual activities ( 26 ). Overall, in line with the study conducted by Muzammil in 2002, the findings of our study confirmed the effect of noise on performance ( 27 ). If the safety issues are not observed in industrial factories and workshops where the workers are exposed to noise generated by the equipment, performance and productivity will decrease significantly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While a study concluded that noise had reduced cognitive function [88], previous findings revealed that decreased cognitive function and brain signals were only significant when exposed to noise at 95 dB and not at 75 or 85 dB [16]. Previous study findings stated that intermittent noise had a greater detrimental effect on performance compared to continuous noise [89]. The findings of this study explained that continuous noise had a different impact than intermittent noise on cognitive ability.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The variability in the current results, and those reported across the literature seems to suggest no conclusive evidence of an effect of noise on performance (Naravane, 2009). Noise may have no effect, may enhance or have a significant negative effect on performance (Muzammil & Hasan, 2004). It seems each study produces different effects of noise on performance depending on the task conducted and the conditions under which the task is conducted (Naravane, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of noise on visual search in human inspection have been addressed by Taylor, Melloy, Dharwada, Gramopadhye, and Toler (2004), finding a decrease in performance for random and intermittent noise patterns relative to continuous noise sources. The results of Muzammil and Hasan (2004) found that noise intensity and the amount of work experience independently predicted performance during continuous noise. They also found that noise intensity, work experience as well as the interaction between noise and work experience were statistically significant for intermittent noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%