2007
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2007.909872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Presence Detection Using Millimeter-Wave Radiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, it has been applied to the detection of human presence in highly cluttered outdoor environments [6], [7]. Detection at millimeter-wave frequencies has many benefits, including near all-weather capability [8] and minimal transmission loss through clothing materials [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been applied to the detection of human presence in highly cluttered outdoor environments [6], [7]. Detection at millimeter-wave frequencies has many benefits, including near all-weather capability [8] and minimal transmission loss through clothing materials [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emissivity of a human body in the microwave band was considered to be 0.65, as reported in [22,28]. The microwave absorbing material ensures a background emissivity close to 1 ( e bkg = 0.99 was assumed).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true positive rate (TPR) quantifies how well the sensor identifies humans when they are present, and is defined by TPR = (number of correct detections)/(total number of detections present). Since the number of correct non-detections (where a human is not present) is so large, the data set is imbalanced [6], thus metrics used to measure the performance of detectors under imbalanced data sets are used: the Fl-measure, given by F 1 = 2PxTPRI(P+TPR), where the precision P = (number of correct detections)/(number of correct detections + number of incorrect detections); and the geometric mean ofP and TPR: G mean = .JPxTPR. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%