Human Primary Olfactory Amygdala Subregions Form Distinct Functional Networks, Suggesting Distinct Olfactory Functions

Abstract

Three subregions of the amygdala receive monosynaptic projections from the olfactory bulb, making them part of the primary olfactory cortex. These primary olfactory areas are located at the anterior-medial aspect of the amygdala and include the medial amygdala (MeA), cortical amygdala (CoA), and the periamygdaloid complex (PAC). The vast majority of research on the amygdala has focused on the larger basolateral and basomedial subregions, which are known to be involved in implicit learning, threat responses, and emotion. Fewer studies have focused on the MeA, CoA, and PAC, with most conducted in rodents. Therefore, our understanding of the functions of these amygdala subregions is limited, particularly in humans. Here, we first conducted a review of existing literature on the MeA, CoA, and PAC. We then used resting-state fMRI and unbiased k-means clustering techniques to show that the anatomical boundaries of human MeA, CoA, and PAC accurately parcellate based on their whole-brain resting connectivity patterns alone, suggesting that their functional networks are distinct, relative both to each other and to the amygdala subregions that do not receive input from the olfactory bulb. Finally, considering that distinct functional networks are suggestive of distinct functions, we examined the whole-brain resting network of each subregion and speculated on potential roles that each region may play in olfactory processing. Based on these analyses, we speculate that the MeA could potentially be involved in the generation of rapid motor responses to olfactory stimuli (including fight/flight), particularly in approach/avoid contexts. The CoA could potentially be involved in olfactory-related reward processing, including learning and memory of approach/avoid responses. The PAC could potentially be involved in the multisensory integration of olfactory information with other sensory systems. These speculations can be used to form the basis of future studies aimed at clarifying the olfactory functions of these under-studied primary olfactory areas.

Emotional recognition across the adult lifespan: Effects of age, sex, cognitive empathy, alexithymia traits, and amygdala subnuclei volumes

“…Cortical amygdala together with medial and central nuclei are often grouped together as the cortico‐medial region (LeDoux, 2007). Cortical amygdala is thought to play a role in olfactory‐related reward processing, including learning and memory of approach/avoid responses (Noto et al, 2021). It is less known how it is involved in emotional processing.…”

Not Only COVID-19: Involvement of Multiple Chemosensory Systems in Human Diseases

“…In other mammals, different sensory organs are hosted in the nasal cavity, including vomeronasal, septal organ, and Grueneberg ganglion, all projecting to the (main or accessory) olfactory bulbs ( Weiler and Farbman, 2003 ; Matsuo et al, 2012 ; Mucignat-Caretta, 2021 ), while in humans, olfactory fibers originate almost exclusively from main olfactory mucosa and run through the first cranial nerve, the olfactory nerve, and contact olfactory bulb mitral cells, the main collector of afferents. From here, olfactory projections radiate mainly, yet not exclusively, to three amygdala subregions, possibly involved in the setup of motor response to olfactory stimuli (medial amygdala), reward and memory processes (cortical amygdala), and multisensory integration (periamygdaloid complex; Noto et al, 2021 ). Notably, amygdala expresses the acid-sensing ion channel ASIC1a, which centrally senses hypercapnia and acidosis and drives the subsequent fear responses in mice ( Ziemann et al, 2009 ), while the human hortolog ACCN2 is associated with amygdala structure and function in panic disorders ( Smoller et al, 2014 ).…”

Leveraging genetic diversity in mice to inform individual differences in brain microstructure and memory

“…The relevance of genetic background to brain microstructure was further probed by examining which ROIs had multiple dMRI measures with significant effects of strain. Excitingly, it was found that 10 ROIs had five or more dMRI measures with significant strain effects, and each of these 10 ROIs (cortical amygdalar area, lateral septal complex, dorsal hippocampal commissure, ventral hippocampal commissure, periventricular zone, lateral amygdalar nucleus, stria medullaris, fimbria, medial pallidum, and behavioral state-related pons) have previously been related to memory and AD ( Amorapanth et al, 2000 ; Maren and Quirk, 2004 ; Castaño et al, 2013 ; Badea et al, 2016 ; Butler et al, 2018 ; Colon-Perez et al, 2019 ; Kim et al, 2019 ; Postans et al, 2020 ; Beardmore et al, 2021 ; Falangola et al, 2021 ; Liao et al, 2021 ; Noto et al, 2021 ; Jordan et al, 2022 ; Juárez-Leal et al, 2022 ; Tsui et al, 2022 ), again suggesting a relationship between brain microstructure and AD outcomes.…”