2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human protein reference database--2006 update

Abstract: Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD) () was developed to serve as a comprehensive collection of protein features, post-translational modifications (PTMs) and protein–protein interactions. Since the original report, this database has increased to >20 000 proteins entries and has become the largest database for literature-derived protein–protein interactions (>30 000) and PTMs (>8000) for human proteins. We have also introduced several new features in HPRD including: (i) protein isoforms, (ii) enhanced search… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
441
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(442 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
441
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied seven prediction algorithms to the HDF data in the context of a human PPI network integrated from seven public databases [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] (see ''Data and Algorithms''). The algorithms were the SinkSource algorithm; a variant called SinkSource+ that does not need negative examples; the commonly-used guilt-by-association approach, both with and without negative examples (called Local and Local+ in this work); a method based on Hopfield networks [13]; the FunctionalFlow algorithm [14]; and another flow-based approach called PRINCE [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We applied seven prediction algorithms to the HDF data in the context of a human PPI network integrated from seven public databases [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] (see ''Data and Algorithms''). The algorithms were the SinkSource algorithm; a variant called SinkSource+ that does not need negative examples; the commonly-used guilt-by-association approach, both with and without negative examples (called Local and Local+ in this work); a method based on Hopfield networks [13]; the FunctionalFlow algorithm [14]; and another flow-based approach called PRINCE [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We gathered human proteinprotein interaction data from seven public databases, BIND, DIP, HPRD, IntAct, MINT, MIPS, and Reactome [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. After removing duplicate interactions and selfinteractions, we obtained a total of 71,461 interactions involving 9,595 proteins.…”
Section: Datasets Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, more simplified schemas that only represent the binary relationships between interacting components have been developed. Some leading databases that follow this approach are BIND, 56 HPRD, 50 MINT, 57 IntAct, 58 DIP, 59,60 KEGG, 61 and PPID. 62 Most of these databases describe mainly binding interactions and yield undirected graphs, wherein the direction of the flow of information is not specified.…”
Section: Databases/network Of Mammalian Protein-protein and Ligand-pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows a protein-protein and ligand-protein interaction network map made of interactions from three databases: a database of mammalian cell-signaling interactions in CA1 neurons we developed manually, 52 BIND human protein-protein interactions dataset, 55 human protein reference database HPRD, 50 and PPID. 62 The chromosome 21 genes that appear in those databases were pulled out of the network map and are highlighted in orange.…”
Section: Databases/network Of Mammalian Protein-protein and Ligand-pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 depicts the analytical flowchart including data collection, features investigation, model training and evaluation, and independent testing. The experimentally verified phosphorylation sites are mainly extracted from dbPTM [24], [25] which has integrated the data from version 9.0 of Phospho.ELM [26], release 20120711 of UniProtKB [27], release 20120730 of PhosphoSitePlus [28], version 1.0 of PHOSIDA [29], version 1.1 of SysPTM [30] and version 9.0 of HPRD [31]. In this work, the data set extracted from Phospho.ELM and UniProtKB is regarded as the training set for sequenced and structural investigation of phosphorylated substrate sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%