1988
DOI: 10.1016/0147-9571(88)90008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human recombinant interleukin-2125 induced in vitro proliferation of equine, caprine, ovine, canine and feline peripheral blood lymphocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous study, it has been reported that rhIL-2 induces the proliferation of PBL from several animals species including canine [7,11,29]. The proliferation of canine lymphocytes by concanavalin A (Con A), phytohemagglutinin or pokeweed mitogen, which are T cell mitogen in human, has also demonstrated [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous study, it has been reported that rhIL-2 induces the proliferation of PBL from several animals species including canine [7,11,29]. The proliferation of canine lymphocytes by concanavalin A (Con A), phytohemagglutinin or pokeweed mitogen, which are T cell mitogen in human, has also demonstrated [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the activity of feline IL-2 can be partially blocked by monoclonal antibody to human IL-2 [29]. The similarities of feline and human IL-2 are further supported by the findings that feline lymphocytes are responsive to human IL-2 [74] and large granular feline cytotoxic lymphocytes are induced by human IL-2 in vitro [71]. Also, infected cats given human IL-2 in combination with 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT) resist challenge with feline leukemia virus [75].…”
Section: (3) Interleukinmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…These results indicate that hrIL-2 can enhance the proliferative response of activated pony lymphocytes. It has been shown that this lymphokine induced in a dose dependent manner the proliferation of unstimulated lymphocytes of horse (FENWICK et al, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%