1995
DOI: 10.1080/09585199500000022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human resource management in developing economies: a comparison of India and Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, these findings are consistent with the findings of Storey et al (1997) that MD in Britain was frequently seen as a matter of "going on courses". Furthermore, these findings are consistent with the findings of Lawler et al (1995) that HR managers in Thailand were less apt to use on-the-job development methods and more apt to use off-the-job development methods. However, these findings are not consistent with Storey et al's (1997) observations in Japan.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Samplessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Further, these findings are consistent with the findings of Storey et al (1997) that MD in Britain was frequently seen as a matter of "going on courses". Furthermore, these findings are consistent with the findings of Lawler et al (1995) that HR managers in Thailand were less apt to use on-the-job development methods and more apt to use off-the-job development methods. However, these findings are not consistent with Storey et al's (1997) observations in Japan.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Samplessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…DEs may find competition with MNEs too intense to devote effort to train their labour only for it to be poached by MNEs. In a study, Lawler et al (1995) observed that Asian firms find employee training to be risky and costly as there are no immediate returns and these trained employees may leave before any benefits can be realised.…”
Section: Discussion Synthesis and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, public-sector firms are owned, funded and controlled collectively by members of political communities at different levels of government (Bozeman, 1987). Research has shown the influence of ownership on HRM policies and practices (Dimick and Murray, 1978;Jackson et al, 1989;Lawler et al, 1995;Hsu and Leat, 2000;Thang and Quang, 2005;Ercek, 2006). 1970s, public-sector managers have been encouraged to emulate the workplace practices and policies of the private sector (Ferlie et al, 1996;Box, 1999).…”
Section: Hrm In Public and Private Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%