2017
DOI: 10.1108/jabs-09-2015-0152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human resource management practices of Japanese companies in India: dealing with the transfer-adaptation dichotomy

Abstract: Purpose Based on the international human resource management perspective, this paper aims to explore and explain the human resource (HR) practices of Japanese multinational companies (MNCs) operating in India. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies a qualitative methodology. The study is based on 17 semi-structured interviews that were conducted within the subsidiaries of 10 Japanese MNCs in India. Findings The respective HR practices are differently influenced by cultural and institutional factors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, global standardisation versus local adaptation of subsidiary HRM practices has been a central issue in the literature on HRM in MNEs (Festing, Knappert, Dowling & Engle, 2012, Pudelko & Harzing, 2007. The majority of these debates, however, have looked at investigating MNEs from developed countries with subsidiaries in developing countries (Chen, Lawler & Bae, 2005;Colakoglu, Allen, Miah, & Bird, 2016;Fan, Xia, Zhang, Zhu & Li, 2016;Ferner, 2009;Fey & Bjorkman, 2001;Glover & Wilkinson, 2007;Kuhlmann, 2012;Lovett, Perez-Nordtvedt & Rasheed, 2009;Maharjan & Sekiguchi, 2017). A smaller stream of research has examined the HRM practices of MNEs from emerging economies (EMNEs) operating their subsidiaries in developed countries (Adams, Nyuur, Ellis, & Debrah, 2017;Chang, Mellahi & Wilkinson, 2009;Fan et al, 2013;Geary, Aguzzoli & Lengler, 2017;Gomes, Sahadev, Glaister, & Demirbag, 2015;Thite, 2015;Thite, Wilkinson & Shah, 2012;Ying Chang, Wilkinson & Mellahi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, global standardisation versus local adaptation of subsidiary HRM practices has been a central issue in the literature on HRM in MNEs (Festing, Knappert, Dowling & Engle, 2012, Pudelko & Harzing, 2007. The majority of these debates, however, have looked at investigating MNEs from developed countries with subsidiaries in developing countries (Chen, Lawler & Bae, 2005;Colakoglu, Allen, Miah, & Bird, 2016;Fan, Xia, Zhang, Zhu & Li, 2016;Ferner, 2009;Fey & Bjorkman, 2001;Glover & Wilkinson, 2007;Kuhlmann, 2012;Lovett, Perez-Nordtvedt & Rasheed, 2009;Maharjan & Sekiguchi, 2017). A smaller stream of research has examined the HRM practices of MNEs from emerging economies (EMNEs) operating their subsidiaries in developed countries (Adams, Nyuur, Ellis, & Debrah, 2017;Chang, Mellahi & Wilkinson, 2009;Fan et al, 2013;Geary, Aguzzoli & Lengler, 2017;Gomes, Sahadev, Glaister, & Demirbag, 2015;Thite, 2015;Thite, Wilkinson & Shah, 2012;Ying Chang, Wilkinson & Mellahi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with few exceptions (Maharjan and Sekiguchi, 2017), the majority of studies investigating the relationship between personality traits and CCA, including those focussing on the Asian context, have been conducted in largely monocultural settings, or at least on the implicit assumption of a single societal culture within the host country. In other words, there has been what Shenkar (2001) calls an “assumption of homogeneity” within the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chance to rely on a strong network, also represented by the employees, through their relationship, increase the effectiveness and efficiency of these companies (Pedersen et al , 2019). This needs to take into account the peculiarity of a single country (Maharjan and Sekiguchi, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%