1987
DOI: 10.1080/01900698708524571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Resources Wasted in Government? - Who's counting?

Abstract: U.S. taxpayers spend over $80 billion a year to meet the Federal civilian payroll. Yet there are signs that a significant part of this investment is being wasted. For example, about $ 2 billion of the total is spent to pay employees who are on sick leave and, in a recent year, over 18 percent of the workforce left government service.While controls are placed on many government assets to guard against waste, similar concern is not directed at the waste of human resources. There are many questions we can't answe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expenditure on training and development in the US Civil Service has been described as "absurdly low" (Lane & Wolf 1990, p.81), mainly, it seems, because training is viewed as a cost rather than an investment (Newell 1987). What limited opportunities have been provided for training and development have tended to focus on financial aspects rather than people management, and few SES members have a positive view of the SES development programs as they exist (Renfrow 1989, p.94).…”
Section: Thining and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expenditure on training and development in the US Civil Service has been described as "absurdly low" (Lane & Wolf 1990, p.81), mainly, it seems, because training is viewed as a cost rather than an investment (Newell 1987). What limited opportunities have been provided for training and development have tended to focus on financial aspects rather than people management, and few SES members have a positive view of the SES development programs as they exist (Renfrow 1989, p.94).…”
Section: Thining and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%