2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-017-0653-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Response to Emergency Communication: A Review of Guidance on Alerts and Warning Messages for Emergencies in Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this stage, 47 hits were retained for abstract screening, which yielded 22 papers for full-text review. Following full-text review by the first author, two papers were retained for inclusion in this review [ 52 , 53 ] (see Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following this stage, 47 hits were retained for abstract screening, which yielded 22 papers for full-text review. Following full-text review by the first author, two papers were retained for inclusion in this review [ 52 , 53 ] (see Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the full-text review process, the decision was taken to exclude two reviews [ 54 , 55 ] which did examine the application of theory in a similar context to that of the two included reviews [ 52 , 53 ]. This decision was taken as the focus of these reviews were more on understanding behaviour during an emergency, rather than the primarily protective or preventative focus of this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of language that is perceived as "clear" and comprehendible by a particular population will need to be developed and tested for that particular population . In addition, short messages can undergo language and readability testing that would improve the public's ability to comprehend in disaster events (see Kuligowski and Omori 2014;Omori et al 2017 for more information on language and readability testing for messages).…”
Section: Increasing Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%