2021
DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2021.1961753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human rights and care homes for older people: a typology of approaches from academic literature as a starting point for activist scholarship in human rights and institutional care

Abstract: Care homes for older people attract human rights discourse. This has intensified during the Covid-19 pandemic, which disproportionately affected care home communities with various human rights ramifications. Activist scholarship in human rights can contribute to the protection and realisation of the rights of people living, working in and visiting care homes through highquality research. This article reports the findings of an analysis of pre-pandemic scholarship that explored the ways authors approached the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While arrangements varied between countries, restrictions were often extensive and prolonged (Barber et al, 2022). The extent of these restrictions, relative to those in wider society, has drawn fresh attention to rights-based approaches to care, in which care home residents are viewed not just as passive recipients of care but as active rights-holders (Emmer De Albuquerque Green et al, 2022) with the concept of autonomy fundamental to such approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While arrangements varied between countries, restrictions were often extensive and prolonged (Barber et al, 2022). The extent of these restrictions, relative to those in wider society, has drawn fresh attention to rights-based approaches to care, in which care home residents are viewed not just as passive recipients of care but as active rights-holders (Emmer De Albuquerque Green et al, 2022) with the concept of autonomy fundamental to such approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although focused on Australia, the article has broader relevance. The article provides an empirical evidence-base for reparations in many other nations in which people living with dementia also experience human rights violations (see, e.g., De Albuquerque Green et al, 2022; Hardwick et al, 2022). Reparations is an important aspect of responding to calls for a fundamental reimagining of the future of LTC institutions that involves deinstitutionalisation (see, e.g., Kontos et al, 2021; Herron et al, 2021; Quinn and Campbell, 2020) and growing recognition in United Nations and regional international human rights systems of the need for equal access to justice and remedies for people with disability and older people (see, e.g., Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2022; Devandas-Aguilar, 2020; Mahler, 2022; Quinn and Doron, 2021; Ruškus, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%