2008
DOI: 10.1348/135532508x284301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human rights and forensic psychology

Abstract: Objectives. Human rights serve to orientate practitioners to the necessary conditions for a minimally worthwhile life for service users, the prerequisites for a life of dignity and a chance at happiness, and the opportunity to incorporate into their life plans cherished values and goals. In this introduction to the special section paper, I discuss the basic concept of human rights and outline their relevance for clinical practice with offenders. Method. I explore the core values associated with human rights … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in the context of offenders with mental disabilities, Birgden and Perlin (2008) argued that TJ could assist forensic psychologists to actively address offender needs based on international declarations of human rights. Forensic psychology, TJ, and human rights can intersect in terms of TJ and forensic psychology (Birgden & Ward, 2003), TJ and human rights (Ward & Birgden, 2007;Winick, 2002), and forensic psychology and human rights (Birgden & Perlin, 2008;Perlin, 2005Perlin, , 2006Perlin & McClain, 2009;Ward, 2008). In common, TJ, forensic psychology, and human rights are normative, humanistic, and interdisciplinary.…”
Section: Therapeutic Jurisprudencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the context of offenders with mental disabilities, Birgden and Perlin (2008) argued that TJ could assist forensic psychologists to actively address offender needs based on international declarations of human rights. Forensic psychology, TJ, and human rights can intersect in terms of TJ and forensic psychology (Birgden & Ward, 2003), TJ and human rights (Ward & Birgden, 2007;Winick, 2002), and forensic psychology and human rights (Birgden & Perlin, 2008;Perlin, 2005Perlin, , 2006Perlin & McClain, 2009;Ward, 2008). In common, TJ, forensic psychology, and human rights are normative, humanistic, and interdisciplinary.…”
Section: Therapeutic Jurisprudencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forensic Psychology is formally defined as the branch of psychology involved in the production and application of psychological principles in the legal system 5 . Applications of forensic psychology have included: the evaluation of competency to stand trial, assessing the validity of mental health defenses in criminal conduct, predicting violent behavior in previous perpetrators of violent crime, measuring mental injury or brain damage, determining level of trauma in international incidents, and decisions related to child welfare in cases of divorce, abuse, etc 6,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that dignity has a close link with human rights, and is often referenced in treaties, books and various human rights documents (Churchill, 2006), means that norms embodying human rights could be viewed constituting ethically sound guidelines to base practice and decision-making on (Ward, 2011). However, with individuals and services in the mental health sector often choosing to embrace these rights with a more legalistic, rather than ethical focus, it can mean that the benefits of a rights-based analysis of ethically complex issues can be subsumed in favour of a more black and white approach (Ward, 2008). Thus, it is instead proposed that the valuable role human rights play can be recognised within an overarching framework that is based on dignity and its core components of well-being and autonomy (Freeden, 1991;Ward, 2008).…”
Section: Chapter Four: Dignity and Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with individuals and services in the mental health sector often choosing to embrace these rights with a more legalistic, rather than ethical focus, it can mean that the benefits of a rights-based analysis of ethically complex issues can be subsumed in favour of a more black and white approach (Ward, 2008). Thus, it is instead proposed that the valuable role human rights play can be recognised within an overarching framework that is based on dignity and its core components of well-being and autonomy (Freeden, 1991;Ward, 2008). It is important to note here that by respecting an individual's rights, one is not promising them a satisfying and fulfilled life; rather, one is guaranteeing that they instead are given the autonomy and freedom to work toward their own goals, values and plans necessary for a dignified life (Connelly & Ward, 2008).…”
Section: Chapter Four: Dignity and Human Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation