Human rights and the clean development mechanism: lessons learned from three case studies

Abstract

This article analyses human rights implications of projects under the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). While the CDM is likely to expire in the near future, the experience gained should be used to inform the rules of the new mechanism to be established under the 2015 Paris Agreement. We argue that the CDM and the new mechanism, as international organisations under the guidance of UNFCCC member states, should apply the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Based on the experience drawn from three case studies (two hydro power projects in Barro Blanco, Panama, and Bujagali, Uganda, and one geothermal energy project in Olkaria, Kenya), we show that CDM projects, while in formal compliance with CDM rules, can lead to a number of human rights infringements. We conclude with a number of recommendations on how to achieve a greater recognition of human rights in the new mechanism under the Paris Agreement.

Linking wastes and climate change: Bandwagoning, contention, and global governance

“…This case connects with a more general literature on the local impacts of global carbon market mechanisms (Obergassel et al, 2017;Purdon, 2012) that in turn connects with resource extraction and conservation-related displacement literatures (Conde & Le Billon, 2017;Fairhead, Leach, & Scoones, 2012;O'Neill et al, 2017). Thus, waste picker organizations chose to use the climate arena to highlight issues critical to them-their livelihoods, community health, and access to resources.…”

Integrated Assessment Mechanism of the Sustainable Development Potential of Ukrainian Companies

“…Reliability of the results is also confirmed by reasonablenessand proximity of the theoretical substantiation of the research findings obtained to the findings of reputable researchers. In particular, the need to consider sustainable development as the economic basis for building a modern economy has been substantiated taking into account the wellfounded by the leading scholars need to combine the requirement of market rationality (Ürge- Vorsatz et al, 2014) with the right of any individual to participate in the production life, to sufficient material security (Kumar, Americo, & Billingham, 2016), to his life and the life of his descendants in an environmentally friendly environment (Liu, 2016;Obergassel, Peterson, Mersmann, Schade, Hofbauer, & Mayr-Hofer, 2017).…”

Implications of COVID-19 on progress in the UN Conventions on biodiversity and climate change

“…align with countries' obligations under other human rights and environmental agreements. Mistakes in the implementation of the Clean Development Mechanism (Ervine, 2015;Obergassel et al, 2017) must be avoided while maintaining the gains on safeguards in the negotiations on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation-Plus (REDD+). Current consideration in the biodiversity and climate conventions, programs, and activities…”

“…Safeguards in Article 6 are crucial to ensure that future actions afford protections for communities and ecosystems where large-scale climate projects are to take place, as well as align with countries' obligations under other human rights and environmental agreements. Mistakes in the implementation of the Clean Development Mechanism (Ervine, 2015; Obergassel et al, 2017) must be avoided while maintaining the gains on safeguards in the negotiations on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation-Plus (REDD+).…”