2020
DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1699343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human rights mechanisms for anti-corruption, transparency and accountability: enabling the right to health

Abstract: Background: The presence of corruption in State institutions and broader society presents a significant obstacle to the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health. The Universal Periodic Review, a Member State-led peer review system administered by the Human Rights Council, is a core tool of human rights, including the right to health accountability. This paper builds on existing research to examine processes that support State engagement on the issue of corruption. We identify opportu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This compels the Comm ESCR to prioritize monitoring budget allocation and removing obstacles that hamper allocation and spending, including corruption. Revisiting Boersma's finding that the IHRIs during the period of 1994 to 2012 had not yet clarified the link between corruption and human rights, Sekalala and Masud made a similar observation as Boersma regarding the vagueness and generality of the recommendations that do not help to target stakeholder action (Sekalala and Masud 2021). This is a missed opportunity because Sekalala and Masud's analysis indicates that although the UPR mechanism has been useful for identifying a variety of health-related human rights issues, it has been used only modestly to identify corruption in the healthcare sector as a human rights concern (ibid).…”
Section: Juwitamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This compels the Comm ESCR to prioritize monitoring budget allocation and removing obstacles that hamper allocation and spending, including corruption. Revisiting Boersma's finding that the IHRIs during the period of 1994 to 2012 had not yet clarified the link between corruption and human rights, Sekalala and Masud made a similar observation as Boersma regarding the vagueness and generality of the recommendations that do not help to target stakeholder action (Sekalala and Masud 2021). This is a missed opportunity because Sekalala and Masud's analysis indicates that although the UPR mechanism has been useful for identifying a variety of health-related human rights issues, it has been used only modestly to identify corruption in the healthcare sector as a human rights concern (ibid).…”
Section: Juwitamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Regarding corruption, the state infringes on the right to health when it allots funds for the underprivileged to receive free treatment in a few designated hospitals. However, the number of deserved hospital directors is arbitrarily reduced, meaning the hospital's activities injure the state and violate the right of the poor to free medical care (Sekalala et al 2020).…”
Section: Corruption As a Human Right Violation: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United Nations (UN) began officially recognizing corruption as a global issue in 2000 by adopting Resolution 55/61. Subsequent resolutions were passed in 2001 and 2002, culminating in establishing the first-ever international treaty on corruption, the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), in 2003 (Sekalala et al, 2020). In recent years, various United Nations human rights mechanisms have acknowledged the detrimental effects of corruption on human rights (Sekalala et al, 2020).…”
Section: Strengthening the Accountability Mechanisms As A Strategy To...mentioning
confidence: 99%