“…The overall SaV-positive rate reported in the present study during the period 2010 to 2018 (1.6%, ranged from 0 to 2.8%) is more or less the same as other similar studies including Bangladesh (2.7%) (Dey et al, 2007), China (1.9%) (Ren et al, 2013), Vietnam (1.4%) (Trang et al, 2012), and Thailand (1.2 and 1.9%) (Khamrin et al, 2017;Supadej et al, 2019). However, when compared to the studies conducted in different geographical regions, the prevalence of SaV detected in this study was lower than those reported from Japan (4.8%), Philippines (7%), USA (5.4%), Italy (6%), Denmark (8.8%), Finland (9.3%), Spain (15.6%), and Nicaragua (17%) (Biscaro et al, 2018;Bucardo et al, 2014;Chhabra et al, 2013;Oka et al, 2015;Thongprachum et al, 2015;Varela et al, 2019). The variation of SaV prevalence in different studies could be explained, at least in part, by the difference in study locations, the detection methods, and the emergence of new epidemic strains.…”