1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf03025462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human serum cholinesterase: Variations during pregnancy and post-partum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventeen per cent of the patients with prolonged apnoea appeared to be homozygous for the usual form of cholinesterase, but had a reduced enzyme activity. In all but one of these patients the cause of the decreased activity was established; metastatic carcinoma (Burnett, 1960), late pregnancy (Hazel and Monier, 1971), intra-abdominal sepsis (Burnett, 1960) and malnutrition (Vorhaus and Kark, 1953) are known causes.…”
Section: Family Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventeen per cent of the patients with prolonged apnoea appeared to be homozygous for the usual form of cholinesterase, but had a reduced enzyme activity. In all but one of these patients the cause of the decreased activity was established; metastatic carcinoma (Burnett, 1960), late pregnancy (Hazel and Monier, 1971), intra-abdominal sepsis (Burnett, 1960) and malnutrition (Vorhaus and Kark, 1953) are known causes.…”
Section: Family Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may reflect the greater cardiac output of full-term pregnant women. The duration of blockade was also significantly longer in the pregnant women and this may be caused by reduced pseudocholinesterase activity (Hazel and Monier, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although the changes in cholinesterase activity throughout the 40 weeks of gestation have been studied widely (Piccoli and Longo, 1947;Levine and Hoyte, 1949;Shnider, 1965;Robertson, 1966;Hazel and Monier, 1971;Evans and Wroe, 1980), at present little precise information is available which defines the pattern of recovery of cholinesterase activity post-partum. It is, however, accepted universally that the decrease in enzyme activity continues for several days postpartum (Shnider, 1965;Hazel and Monier, 1971;Blitt et al, 1977;Evans and Wroe, 1980) before returning to normal non-pregnant values between the 10th day (Piccoli and Longo, 1947) and the 6th week post-partum (Barnes and Epperson, 1952), although the latter is probably an over-generous estimate of the time required to restore the cholinesterase activity to its non-pregnant value. Successive pregnancies have no repercussions on cholinesterase activities, thus indicating that antibody formation does not result in decreased cholinesterase activity (Hazel and Monier, 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, accepted universally that the decrease in enzyme activity continues for several days postpartum (Shnider, 1965;Hazel and Monier, 1971;Blitt et al, 1977;Evans and Wroe, 1980) before returning to normal non-pregnant values between the 10th day (Piccoli and Longo, 1947) and the 6th week post-partum (Barnes and Epperson, 1952), although the latter is probably an over-generous estimate of the time required to restore the cholinesterase activity to its non-pregnant value. Successive pregnancies have no repercussions on cholinesterase activities, thus indicating that antibody formation does not result in decreased cholinesterase activity (Hazel and Monier, 1971). Despite the decrease in the value of cholinesterase activity at the time of Caesarean section the patient exhibited no evidence of "suxamethonium sensitivity".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%