1981
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90402-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human social conversation: Effects of ethanol, secobarbital and chlorpromazine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This nonlinear dose response on measures of social interaction remains to be investigated. The effects of MDMA on social interaction appear to be similar to effects of several other drugs, including alcohol and other stimulant drugs (Higgins and Stitzer 1988; Lindfors and Lindman 1987; Marrone et al 2010; Stitzer et al 1981; Ward et al 1997). Whether specific aspects of the pro-social effects of MDMA distinguish it from other drugs remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This nonlinear dose response on measures of social interaction remains to be investigated. The effects of MDMA on social interaction appear to be similar to effects of several other drugs, including alcohol and other stimulant drugs (Higgins and Stitzer 1988; Lindfors and Lindman 1987; Marrone et al 2010; Stitzer et al 1981; Ward et al 1997). Whether specific aspects of the pro-social effects of MDMA distinguish it from other drugs remains to be determined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The drug is commonly used in social settings, and MDMA users claim that they use the drug specifically to experience the prosocial effects (Bravo 2001; Sumnall et al 2006). The interactions between this and other drugs and social environments are likely to be bi-directional: Drugs such as alcohol and stimulant drugs increase talking and social interaction (Higgins and Stitzer 1988; Lindfors and Lindman 1987; Marrone et al 2010; Stitzer et al 1981; Ward et al 1997), and conversely, many drugs are experienced as more pleasurable in the presence of others (e.g., alcohol: (Doty and de Wit 1995; Kirkpatrick and de Wit 2013), diazepam (Evans et al 1996), marijuana (Kelly et al 1994), and d- amphetamine (de Wit et al 1997). Despite the known role of social context on drug responses, relatively few controlled studies have examined these interactions in human volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies provide support for this model. For example, clinical laboratory studies show that stimulant and sedative drugs increase verbal behavior and social interaction (Stitzer et al, 1981;Higgins and Stitzer, 1986;Ward et al, 1997), suggesting that the reinforcing effects of a drug are increased when there is a pharmacologically induced enhancement of social interaction (i.e., the cocktail-party phenomenon). This possibility has been examined by testing the effects of amphetamine, secobarbital, and marijuana on talking behavior and preference for social interaction among healthy volunteers (Heishman and Stitzer, 1989).…”
Section: B Social Influencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cultures alcohol is still consumed extensively and drinking is associated with disinhibition and its positive social effects. Indeed, several experimental studies have shown that alcohol increases talkativeness, self‐expression, sociability, friendliness, and positive mood (Babor et al., 1983; De Wit and Doty, 1994; Doty and De Wit, 1995; Knight and Godfrey, 1993; Lindfors and Lindman, 1987; Lindman, 1982; Smith et al., 1975; Stitzer et al., 1981). These effects may help explain the reinforcing properties of alcohol in social situations (Griffiths et al., 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%